Comments for RANDOM THOTS

Comment on IF NEWT GETS THE NOD, THERE WILL BE WAR by Bob B

Bob B — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 10:48:19 +0000

Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul are the only visionaries, but none of the four are dunces. Gingrich is the most powerful speaker by far. His strengths are obvious, his weaknesses are not. Paul lost me when he blamed the World Trade Center bombing on America. Gingrich lost me with his vicious attacks on members of the only party we have and our only hope to defeat Obama in November.

Comment on IF NEWT GETS THE NOD, THERE WILL BE WAR by Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:10:59 +0000

You people are taking your polls in he wrong place. Everyone I know likes Newt. He is the only BRAIN In the bunch.

Comment on BARACK OBAMA’S VAUNTED CONCESSION TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH by Ron W

Ron W — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:34:26 +0000

How true your comments are, Bob.

How gullible half the people in the U.S. are who hear Obama’s Soviet-Style word smithing and swallow it.

Thanks for continuing your communications,
Ron

Comment on WILL THE CATHOLIC FLAP COST OBAMA THE ELECTION? by BARACK OBAMA’S VAUNTED CONCESSION TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH | RANDOM THOTS

BARACK OBAMA’S VAUNTED CONCESSION TO THE CATHOLIC CHURCH | RANDOM THOTS — Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:07:41 +0000

[...] are formed by speeches and headlines while truth and reality often remain in obscurity. In a prior post on this subject, I wrote “If there is one thing the President knows well, it is the art of [...]

Comment on OBAMA GUTS NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND by Ron W

Ron W — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:05:38 +0000

Funny how the media spins this. I am looking at the headline in USA Today (Feb 10 edition) and, while emphasizing the word “frees,” here is what it said: “Obama frees 10 states from No Child Left Behind.” Frees??

It should have read “Obama leaves 10 states’ children behind.”

I agree that the law was flawed, but your point is correct: Obama does not have the authority to change or take away a law. Maybe he is taking lessons from Putin. “Do it and dare them to try stopping you.” Yes, he has to be stopped.

Comment on WILL THE CATHOLIC FLAP COST OBAMA THE ELECTION? by Ronw

Ronw — Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:17:15 +0000

Well Said, Bob! As a Catholic, I can say that people attending my church do seem to be outraged – and I hope this really does wake up the many Catholics and Jewish folks who blindly have followed the Far Left down the path of destruction.

Comment on SUPER BOWL COMMERCIAL by Ron W

Ron W — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:52:14 +0000

Reminds me of a rendition of the saying: “look who’s talking now!”

Comment on PROPAGANDIC, THE NOUN by FOOD STAMPS AREN’T STAMPS AND THEY’RE NOT JUST GOOD FOR FOOD | RANDOM THOTS

FOOD STAMPS AREN’T STAMPS AND THEY’RE NOT JUST GOOD FOR FOOD | RANDOM THOTS — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:18:57 +0000

[...] general welfare program parading as something it isn’t. The program is genuine but the title is propagandic, chosen to make more palatable to the 53% of voters who pay [...]

Comment on THE NEW YORK TIMES ON DAVOS by mercadeo

mercadeo — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:44:20 +0000

The Global Risks Landscape 2011 reveals that respondents in general perceive event-driven risks as having higher impact than risks that are more chronic in nature and more distributed over time. This is a well-known bias in risk perception: there is a tendency to discount the impact of risks which are long-term and familiar, and the tendency to inflate the impact of risks which involve extreme “shocks”, such as fiscal crises and geopolitical conflict.

Comment on GINGRICH and the ‘STUCK WITH’ REPUBLICANS by Bob B

Bob B — Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:51:51 +0000

I put my faith in the American people that enough of them know this will be the most critical election of their lives. The RNC has prepared some devastating videos to run between the convention and the election. By November the public will know Obama like they have never known him before.
The people will not be voting for Romney or Obama; they will be voting for their country or for Obama.