Tag Archives: Palin

BLOOD LIBEL AND BRING A GUN TO THE FIGHT

“Blood libel” was a series of actual false accusations that morphed into a general term. A blood libel is defined as a serious false accusation. It is derived from ancient and not so ancient accusations that Jews drank the blood of Christian babies. The belief survives today in the minds of some extremist Muslims.

If someone said that Obama told a group of Philadelphia supporters, referring to Republicans, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we will bring a gun”, it would not be blood libel because it’s true. But if in turn, it was claimed that his rhetoric caused the Gifford shooting it would fit the definition of the term “blood libel” – a serious false accusation. That’s what Sarah Palin suffered.

Within the Jewish community, the term blood libel has connotations not so widely known elsewhere. We know that it was an unfortunate choice of words because it raised the sensitivities of some people, understandably so. It would have been better had she called the accusations “cheap shots”.

LAUGHNER, PALIN AND HATE

A demented young man, whose most prized books are the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Hitler’s Mein Kampf, becomes obsessed with rage when he gets no answer from a politician to an unintelligible question he has posed about the meaning of words. The man takes a gun, shoots the Democratic politician, and kills a Republican judge, a nine year old child and a few other people. And then, some people blame Sarah Palin. It makes no more sense than when President Bush was blamed for a tsunami that hit Hawaii and an earthquake in Haiti. But this time a significant number of people hold to the absurdity.

When Sarah Palin first burst onto the national scene less than three years ago, my instant impression was – what a breath of fresh air! She is cheerful and articulate, a sprightly woman of good spirits with commendable family values. How did she come to be the focus of so much hatred? It is not an easy question to answer.

Hatred, like love, is an emotion; it does not need a reason. It comes from the heart not from the mind. To search for a reason for hatred of Palin is to search in vain. We must search instead for a cause.

Sarah Palin holds no office, passed no laws, committed no frauds and speaks no evil of anyone. She has said nothing more outrageous than “You can see Russia from Alaska.” As a possible presidential candidate for office, Palin may be a political threat to the left, but no more than any other presidential contender. Some would say less, because they think she is un-electable.

Rush Limbaugh is irreverent, bombastic and arrogant. Palin is none of these, yet much greater and deeper hatred befalls her. The left understands Limbaugh; his style is not unlike many of their own. He is the enemy they know. But a person like Sarah Palin is alien to today’s progressives on the left. It is in the nature of man to harbor great fear of the unknown, a fear that at times extends beyond all rationality. Imaginations are left to run wild. Such seems to be the case with the Tea Party and Palin.

Hatred is an emotion that trickles from the right and flows like a great river from the left. Perhaps in that, there lies a clue. The right is more religious than the left. Their religion teaches tolerance and love. Not all believers follow the teachings of course, but there is no equivalent central force denouncing hate in the agnostic, atheist or existential world.

There is an old Cherokee fable known as the Parable of Two Wolves that sheds some light on the question. You can read it here.

NORTH KOREA, PALIN AND OUR POLICY

­­­It appears Kim Jong Il wants another reward from the United States for stopping an aggression he started. Obama says we should talk. Ramirez captures the spirit of  U.S. policy. If they bomb us, we will not stand by idle. We will prepare some tea and insist on a chat with them about it.

Sarah Palin was expressing some better ideas on the Glenn Beck Show when she referred to “our North Korean ally”. It was an obvious slip of the lip, immediately corrected. When Barack Obama makes such a gaffe, and there have been many, they go largely unreported. Not so, with Palin of course. Here’s Sarah’s humorous response:

A Thanksgiving Message to All 57 States
by Sarah Palin on Thursday, November 25, 2010 at 5:46pm

My fellow Americans in all 57 states, the time has changed for come. With our country founded more than 20 centuries ago, we have much to celebrate – from the FBI’s 100 days to the reforms that bring greater inefficiencies to our health care system. We know that countries like Europe are willing to stand with us in our fight to halt the rise of privacy, and Israel is a strong friend of Israel’s. And let’s face it, everybody knows that it makes no sense that you send a kid to the emergency room for a treatable illness like asthma and they end up taking up a hospital bed. It costs, when, if you, they just gave, you gave them treatment early, and they got some treatment, and ah, a breathalyzer, or an inhalator. I mean, not a breathalyzer, ah, I don’t know what the term is in Austrian for that…

The gibberish above is based, of course, on a series of misstatements and verbal gaffes made by Barack Obama. Links are included to confirm the series of misstatements.

PALIN AND THE PLUMBER

No, this is not a sequel to Lady Chatterley’s Lover. But Sarah Palin and Joe the Plumber do have something in common. Both were the subject of instant, vicious and very personal attacks from the left.

Promptly upon McCain’s announcement of his choice for running mate, a passel of investigative lawyers were dispatched to Alaska to explore, not for gold but for dirt. The Daily Kos crowd railed against both Joe and Sarah. The charge that the Palins lied about who was the real mother of baby Trig was first levied less than 10 hours following Sarah Palin’s acceptance speech. Joe the plumber’s integrity was called into question when some researcher discovered the plumber’s first name was not Joe, but Samuel. The fact that his middle name is Joseph remained unsaid. Ohio government workers were given the illegal task of rummaging through confidential files in search of something to discredit workingman Joe.

Watching all this unfold reminded me of one fateful day when I was a child, growing up on the coast in the great state of Maine. Dad was working on a customer’s boat and I was sliding down a dirt bank on the nearby shore. Boys do those things. I slid right through a massive nest of ground bees. The bees did not like it. Instant, vicious and personal came the united attack, a sample of community organization at its best.

Palin and the plumber, two fine and decent Americans suddenly and viciously were set upon by those perceiving a direct assault threatening their ideology, responding like that swarm of bees suffering a direct assault on their home in the turf.

I hold no grudge against the bees. But I find it difficult to be as generous to those who attack people who have ideas when they should be directing their attacks at the ideas, not the people.

Bob B