Tag Archives: John Lewis

OCCUPY – NOW THE UGLY SIDE

As the world turns the Occupy groups evolve.  They are one thing today and another tomorrow.  They are one thing here and another thing over there.  Two days ago we reported on the movement’s better side.  Today we report on its ugly face.

Occupiers in New York desecrate the American flag by laying it on the ground and walking on it for the camera.

Occupiers in Portland, Oregon compose a song entitled “F*** AMERICA” and sing those lyrics on the street.

The movement has been given the official endorsement of The Communist Party USA

A crowd in Atlanta makes it clear they want to hear Democratic Congressman and civil rights hero John Lewis speak.  But a declared Marxist facilitator manipulates the crowd into denying Lewis the opportunity to speak.

An Occupy LA speaker says the time has finally come; it’s time for the militant revolution.

Barack Obama has voiced unqualified support to the Occupiers, without reservations or condemnation of any of their actions.  The movement is the direct result of class warfare launched and perpetuated by him with support from the press and the Democratic party.

We are witnessing a classic organizing technique in the Alinsky model being played out on a national scale and led by the world’s most renowned community organizer.  Alinsky called his rules tactics.  Tactic number 13 is “Pick a target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it”.  Obama picked the banks, is freezing his target with endless repetition, polarizing it with attacks on millionaires and billionaires and personalizing it by relating it to the lack of jobs.

If you are dismayed by all this; you can’t say you weren’t warned.  As a candidate, the President said he would never turn his back on the “God damn America” preacher who gave him the inspiration for his life’s work.  And then he proudly proclaimed his community organizing experience as a prime qualification for his election to the presidency.  Sometimes you actually do get what you asked for.

Communist Party USA also supports the Obama-endorsed Occupy Wall Street Protests.

From the CPUSA website:

OCCUPY ATLANTA Part II

We have our answer to the question of whether or not Occupy Atlanta is a Marxist movement.  Here is second video from the same event where John Lewis was turned away. This is the essence of what the facilitator tells the demonstrators.

We say to those of you who are with us, you may disagree with us and you may leave us.  But you should know that if you leave us you will be joining those who want to kill us.  Remember when the battle comes, you will be on the other side.

Then quoting verbatim:

“I’ll say one more thing, as a Marxist student what I am saying here is not out of my own head.  It is out of the history of the revolutionary movement international”.

For some reason the video would not embed. To play it click on this link.

Now the question becomes, is Occupy Wall Street a Marxist operation like Atlanta?  At this point, it appears they are not.  The Atlanta operation is frightening but less dangerous than it appears.  Their methods are too extreme to gain a wide following.

Now the question becomes, is Occupy Wall Street a Marxist operation like Atlanta?  At this point, it appears they are not. The Atlanta operation is frightening but less dangerous than it appears.  Their methods are too extreme to gain a wide following.

OCCUPY ATLANTA – IS THIS THE FACE OF MARXISM?

No doubt you have seen the video.  Scary, isn’t it.  Raises goose bumps.  The weirdness of it raises many questions as well.  Who are these people?  What’s their agenda?  Are they connected with Occupy Wall St?  If so, then how?  Who was the man at the microphone?  Who was his sidekick in the crowd?  Where are they from?  Are they or are they not a typical Occupy group?  If they are part of the liberal left, why did they deny John Lewis a chance to speak?  Could they be a conservative group?  Why was there a paucity of blacks in the crowd?  Is this or is it not the face of Marxism?

We will try to answer some of these questions.  It is too soon to come to any firm conclusions but it is not too early to examine the evidence.  Let’s ‘go to the tape’

The first thing that we notice is the use of the cultish technique of speak and chant.  The technique accomplishes several things.  It slows down the presentation and allows the speaker to stay in control.  It allows the speaker to lead the crowd in the desired direction and fool the crowd into thinking that the decisions were theirs, and not those of the facilitator.  Chanting mesmerizes the mind, blocking out independent thinking.  Chanting together in a crowd unifies the members creating the impression of universal agreement.

Next we notice the raising of hands in the air.  This gesture is reminiscent of religious practice more common among the more fundamental denominations.  The reason given here for the raising of hands at the demonstration is because clapping prevents people from being heard.  That reason is absurd.  The people were clapping to hear someone speak, not to shut them up.  Nevertheless, the programmed crowd chants the reason back.  With that, they have verbalized agreement with the leader, bypassing individual thought.  And so it goes with decisions on other matters as well.  If someone in the crowd speaks up with an opinion that is contrary to the leader’s position but popular with the crowd, there will be no clapping.

Watching the video, it is abundantly clear from the start that many in the crowd wanted to hear John Lewis.  In fact it certainly appeared like the majority wanted to hear him.  Majority or not, just “many” should be enough unless the minority is to be denied a voice.  There was very positive finger waving in the beginning when the facilitator asked the crowd how they felt about John Lewis.  There was also a lot of clapping which prompted the facilitator to restrict any more of that.  Nevertheless, the leader and his sidekick in the crowd were successful in maneuvering the people to get behind them and deny John Lewis the opportunity to speak.

Exactly why the organizers didn’t want Lewis to speak remains a puzzle.

In case you are wondering, the facilitator was asking what the block or blocks have said, not what the blogs have said.  He used the term block to mean the Occupy group.  At the end the repeated chant was “mic is dead”, meaning Lewis will not be given a live microphone to speak.

Now play the video again to see how much you agree with the assessment given here.

http://youtu.be/3QZlp3eGMNI

TO BE CONTINUED