Category Archives: Economy

OCCUPY – NOW THE UGLY SIDE

As the world turns the Occupy groups evolve.  They are one thing today and another tomorrow.  They are one thing here and another thing over there.  Two days ago we reported on the movement’s better side.  Today we report on its ugly face.

Occupiers in New York desecrate the American flag by laying it on the ground and walking on it for the camera.

Occupiers in Portland, Oregon compose a song entitled “F*** AMERICA” and sing those lyrics on the street.

The movement has been given the official endorsement of The Communist Party USA

A crowd in Atlanta makes it clear they want to hear Democratic Congressman and civil rights hero John Lewis speak.  But a declared Marxist facilitator manipulates the crowd into denying Lewis the opportunity to speak.

An Occupy LA speaker says the time has finally come; it’s time for the militant revolution.

Barack Obama has voiced unqualified support to the Occupiers, without reservations or condemnation of any of their actions.  The movement is the direct result of class warfare launched and perpetuated by him with support from the press and the Democratic party.

We are witnessing a classic organizing technique in the Alinsky model being played out on a national scale and led by the world’s most renowned community organizer.  Alinsky called his rules tactics.  Tactic number 13 is “Pick a target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it”.  Obama picked the banks, is freezing his target with endless repetition, polarizing it with attacks on millionaires and billionaires and personalizing it by relating it to the lack of jobs.

If you are dismayed by all this; you can’t say you weren’t warned.  As a candidate, the President said he would never turn his back on the “God damn America” preacher who gave him the inspiration for his life’s work.  And then he proudly proclaimed his community organizing experience as a prime qualification for his election to the presidency.  Sometimes you actually do get what you asked for.

Communist Party USA also supports the Obama-endorsed Occupy Wall Street Protests.

From the CPUSA website:

PERSONAL REPORT from OCCUPIED WALL ST

The OCCUPIED WALL STREET JOURNAL

Once every year, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) joins with the St John’s University School of Law to host a triathlon where senior law students compete in a series of mock negotiations, mediations and arbitrations.  This year I was asked by FINRA to serve as a judge.  It takes place on a week end and the dress code is specified as business casual.  Every student wore a suit and tie.  Every suit was black.  But for the lack of sun glasses the event could have been mistaken as a gathering of U.S. Secret Service men and women.

The competition takes place in lower Manhattan, just a short walk from Zucotti Park, better known locally by its former name, Liberty Square.  This, of course, is the camp grounds of the people who call themselves the 99 and Occupy Wall Street.  With a 2 hour lunch break, you know what I did.  Two blocks up to Broadway, hang a right, walk past St Paul’s Church and there it is, Zucotti Park.  St Paul’s, by the way, was opened in 1766 and bills itself as Manhattan’s oldest public building in continuous use – a place where George Washington worshiped and where 911 recovery workers received around-the-clock care.

A march had started and was coming up Broadway from the park.  A motley, but not too motley crew was holding the usual signs, “BANKS ARE OUR ENEMY NOT IRAN”.  “WE ARE THE 99”, AND ‘FREE PALESTINE” were about as offensive as they got.  There were no Nazi signs, no call for blood and almost no profanity, but they weren’t Tea Party types either.  The marchers looked more like a roster of the perpetually unemployed and perpetually protesting types.  They stood in stark contrast to the triathlon competitors just a few blocks away.

I asked a marcher for a copy of  The Occupied Wall Street Journal.  As he handed it to me he wanted me to know it was the official paper of the movement.  I folded it and tucked it away for future reading.  When I reached the corner of Viscotti Park there was an official looking man sitting at an official looking table with a sign – INFORMATION.  The man was about 40, clean-shaven and respectable looking except for his cap.  Now I’ve seen a lot of grimy caps.  I’ve even worn some, but never like this one.  It looked like he could wring it out and get enough to change the oil in his car; but he probably didn’t have a car.

He had copies of the same newspaper on his table.  I asked if it was the official paper of the movement.  He said “there is no official paper of the movement”.  I asked if there was a connection between Occupy Wall St and the international movement Occupy Together.  He hadn’t heard of Occupy Together.  I asked if his group had a list of their demands.  He answered “No. we are still creating one in the General Assemblies”.

“Where are the General Assemblies held”?  I asked.  “Right here in the corner of the park.  We gather every evening and the people decide by a democratic process what the demands should be.” he replied.  Then he turned away.  I guess he was embarrassed because of his hat.

The “angry mob” doesn’t seem so alarming up and close as they do on the TV news.  They simply are not achievers like the law students.  However they do vote.  They also serve well as a propagandic public relations platoon in a politician’s Army of Useful Idiots.

As long as the country continues to produce law students like those I saw and judged at the triathlon, we as a nation have nothing to fear.  Our greatness is currently under threat. As to the threat “This too, shall pass.”

UPDATE
Please read later posts on the subject of the Occupy movement.  Things are changing very fast, and not for the better.

OCCUPY LA, IT GETS WORSE

When the Tea Party rose on the scene it was no mystery who they were and what they were all about.  Oh, of course there were some who didn’t have a clue.  They were the people about whom we’ve been saying for years “they just don’t get it” and they don’t.  Now, the shoe is on the other foot.  Who are all these people who call themselves Occupiers?  I just don’t get it.

Gradually we are finding out.  At least a few of them are hard line Marxists; at least some of the organizers are.  Los Angeles can be added to Atlanta in the come-the-revolution category.  Here are the videos.  Judge for yourself.

Occupy LA

In this video a young women is leading the group and calling out :”Where’s our bailouts”? Apparently she’s one of the disappointed ones who still have to make their own mortgage payments.  Note the lingo as she speaks; she rails on about infrastructure, healthcare and corporate greed.  “Corporate fat cats have to go”.  Where have you heard that before?  It’s straight out of Obama’s book.  And it’s not just some words he throws out occasionally; it’s a drumbeat he plays in speech after speech. 

“Bloody violence will be necessary and it is coming to achieve our goals, yes a revolution”.  Those may not be the exact words but they are the sum and substance of what the speaker said.  Barack Obama may have no direct connection whatever to the Occupy people, but he held out the welcome sign, opened the door and is holding it for them.  He has given them the words to say and pointed out the enemy he wants them to attack.  Community organizer extraordinaire.  Saul Alinsky must be smiling in his grave.


There have been many claims made recently that Obama is competing with Jimmy Carter for the title of worst president ever.  In reality, there is no competition.  Carter just did a lousy job but he was an American president, whereas Barack Hussein Obama’s administration is, as Pamela Geller declares in her book, A Post American Presidency.

More OCCUPY posts to come.  In the meantime, get a copy of Geller’s book.

 

OCCUPY WALL STREET, GRASS ROOTS OR ORGANIZED FROM THE START?

Both sides of the media are reporting that the movement known as Occupy Wall Street is a serendipitous event, something that just sprung up naturally from a garden of discontent.  But did it?

On September 17, 2011 a few students sat on the sidewalk in lower Manhattan and called their little protest group Days of Rage (DoR).  Supposedly this was the genesis of the larger movement now known as Occupy Wall Street (OWS).  If OWS was a spontaneous outgrowth from DoR how do you account for the fact that occupywallst.org was registered as a website domain on July 14, 2011, a full two months prior to the first day of the Wall St Days of Rage sit in ?

OWS appears to be a well planned fully orchestrated program in response to the Tea Party.  Make no mistake, OWS is a national operation.  Just days into the launch at the Brooklyn Bridge nearly 900 local community organizations from Florida to the State of Washington are up and running with event dates and websites.

.

Locations of OWS operations

A long list of supporters was posted on the website at www.occupywallst.org on Oct 4th but the page appears to have been taken down.  The SEIU and a NY Local of the American Federation of Teachers were among a list of ten to 15 unions.  MoveOn.org was one of the well known names on the longer list of advocacy groups behind the movement.

OWS is developing as a mirror image of the Tea Party, well dressed non-violent, heavily middle class and united behind a cause.  The Tea Party argues for less intrusive government and for getting federal spending under control.  The Tea Party is a force moving the country to the right.  OWS demonstrates against the rich, against the banks and against the financial foundations of capitalism.  OWS is a force that would move the country to the left.  At this nascent stage they appear to have a great deal of popular support, particularly from the middle class.

Socialist leaders have long known that a large and satisfied middle class is the greatest obstacle to gaining control in a democratic nation as prosperous as the U.S.  As long as the middle class is content with their status they will reject the appropriation and redistribution of their assets that socialism requires, supposedly for the common good.  One answer is force, i.e. violent revolution.  The other, and far better answer, is to foment unrest, build anger to the point where there is widespread dissatisfaction within the middle class.  And then present free markets as the cause and socialism as the cure.  The voters will do the rest.

Anger requires a target.  The rich, the banks and Wall Street suit the bill perfectly.  The rich are a defenseless minority that engender very little sympathy.  All that’s needed is a strong community organizer to set them up as the target, someone with some clout, someone with a bully pulpit.  Enter stage left – Barack Obama.

Saul Alinsky taught that socialism’s path to power is like a three act play.

Act I is join the crowd, gain respect, gain acceptance and legitimacy.
Barack Obama has done that.

Act II is the development of anger and the spreading of discontent to enroll as many supporters as possible for Act III.
By intent or not, Barack Obama is doing that.

Act III is the final wresting of control of the government from the establishment.
Barack Obama won’t be doing that, but it’s not for lack of trying.

There is no way to know the President’s real goal, but if it is the establishment of a socialist state he’s doing everything just right; and that includes Occupy Wall Street.

DAVID BROOKS and THE LOST DECADE

David Brooks

Image via Wikipedia

Give the devil his due and the devil’s domain too.  When they’re right, they’re right.  David Brooks has an excellent Op Ed piece in today’s New York Times.  The title belies the content.  The article is better than its label.

Brooks points out that “Roger Altman, a former deputy Treasury secretary, is arguing that America and Europe are on the verge of a disastrous double-dip recession”.  Republicans and Democrats are stuck in their own one cure solutions.  Democrats say government needs to spend more to jump start the economy. They always say that.  Republicans say the government needs to tax less and get out of the way, and then the recovery will begin.  They always say that.

Brooks is more disposed to the idea of throwing out the bath water, throwing out the baby, throwing out the tub, throwing out the towels, the soap, the powder, the whole ball of wax.  Then he would start anew with a flat tax.  He doesn’t say it but he describes it.  Brooks would give the whole international banking and monetary system the Ron Paul treatment and start from scratch.  But he calls it the holistic approach.  Read it if you want to see David’s solutions.

[David, did I read you right?]

Roger Altman, a former deputy Treasury secretary, is arguing that America and Europe are on the verge of a disastrous double-dip recession

FREEMAN IS LOOKING THROUGH RACE COLORED GLASSES

Black actor Morgan Freeman had this exchange on the Piers Morgan show: (click here for the video)

FREEMAN: Mitch McConnell. Their stated policy, publicly stated, is to do whatever it takes to see to it that Obama only serves one term. What’s, what does that, what underlines that? “Screw the country. We’re going to whatever we do to get this black man, we can, we’re going to do whatever we can to get this black man outta here.”

PIERS MORGAN: But is that necessarily a racist thing?

FREEMAN: It is a racist thing.

PIERS MORGAN: Is it not Republicans, wouldn’t that say that about any Democrat president?

FREEMAN: No…

Early in his presidency, Barack Obama promised his stimulus bill would bring down unemployment.  He warned unemployment could rise as high as 8% if his bill did not pass Congress.  It passed quickly and easily.  Unemployment soared to over 9% and is still there.  Particularly hard hit are black Americans with rates over 20% in some districts.

Obama promised the first thing he would do is close Gitmo.  Gitmo is still open.  He promised to bring all of our troops home quickly from Iraq.  Troops are still there.

Obama promised unprecedented openness in government.  He said he would open the doors wide for CSPAN to cover debates on every important issue and then he shut them out of coverage on the health care bill.  We got less openness, not more.  Obama promised he would require every bill presented to him to be published on the internet for 5 days of public comment before signing it.  And then even Senators and Congressmen weren’t given copies of the bill, if they were Republicans, until 3 days before they had to vote on it.

When Barack Obama assumed office the country was dangerously in debt.  Instead of proposing steps to bring the debt down to safe levels, he campaigned incessantly for dramatic increases in spending to the point where our credit rating was downgraded for the first time in history.

Obama submitted a budget that was so out of line with realities that not even one single Democrat would vote for it.

He has alienated our friends, coddled our enemies and pointed out our shortcomings in speech after speech made abroad.  Black Caucus members have recently expressed their dissatisfaction with the President.

Mr. Freeman, don’t you suppose, just suppose, that some people might object to Obama’s presidency, not because of his color, but because of what he has done?

EXPLAINING BERNANKE’S TWIST

When an economy needs a little boost, the lowering of interest rates spurs consumer big ticket buying and encourages businesses to expand by lowering the cost of anything that is financed.  However, with short term interest rates already near zero, this tool is no longer in the Federal Reserve’s toolbox.  So Bernanke’s move is to lower long term rates in the hope that that will encourage companies to expand and consumers to increase their purchases of automobiles and homes. That’s the Bernanke Twist.

Tell me, with short term rates near zero and long term rates at 1.94%, the lowest in more than a half century, how much more likely is it you will buy a car if long rates go from 1.9 percent to perhaps 1.7 percent?  How much more likely is it the owner of the tire store in your neighborhood will open another outlet now that he can borrow for a few pennies less?  None. 

Corporations are not lacking money.  Consumers are not holding back because of interest rates.  The Fed is pushing on a string — again.  It is not the cost of money or the lack of money in the system that is holding back a recovery.  It’s executive government policy that’s crippling the economy.  The tire shop owner may be ready and anxious to open another store, but first he must know how much it will cost to take on the new employees.  He also needs to know what the latest regulations are and how much it will cost to comply with them.  But none of this is knowable given the complexities of Obamacare and the vagueness written into many of the new laws.  So we sit.

What this country needs is not a good 5 cent cigar or lower interest rates.  What this country needs is a presidential election year.  Let’s hope the voters don’t make the same mistake twice.

RANDOM THOTS AFTER THE SPEECH

Markets plunge after speech
Is it Europe or is it Barack Obama’s speech.  It’s both.  The common denominator is the playing out of socialistic agendas.  Europe was a little farther along Insolvency Road but Obama is propelling us to what may prove to be a photo finish.

BHO is FDR Redux, not Carter II
Minutes after Random Thots published Jobs and Economics a la Barack Obama, Steven Hayward published Obama vs. FDR.  Great minds think alike.  There is little doubt (in great minds, that is) that BHO is repeating FDR’s mistakes. Everyone should read The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes. It is the definitive work on FDR.  I would also refer you to my article in American Thinker on the Obama/Roosevelt comparison. (shameless plug).

Turner 50 – Weprin 44   WOW !
If you are not a woman you can never know what it is like to birth a baby.  If you are not from District 9 in Brooklyn you can never know the significance of Turner’s lead over Weprin.  It was about as likely as a Bernie Sanders endorsement of Sarah Palin.  We covered the race initially in Daily News Endorses Turner vs. Weprin. It is understandable why the President’s wife bowed her head and appeared to pray before her husband spoke.

OBAMA’S BIG JOBS LECTURE

SUMMARY – You’ve heard my lecture, Republicans! Now pass my bill!!

It was a terrible speech.  It was better than I expected.

I give myself zip on the prediction there would be nothing but lip service for small business.  Details are sparse but it does appear there is some help for small and medium size companies.  Other good points include some preferential treatment for our veterans and a speech that bore on the greatness of our country, not our faults.  On the latter point, I hope it’s not like a response to that line in a movie where the neglected woman pleads with her lover “Just tell me you love me.  You don’t have to mean it.“

Barack was angry.  Michelle showed signs of stress.  Smiles were few.  There was not a light moment in Obama’s speech.  Michelle’s usual happy face and essence of delight that only a woman can impart was gone. In its place we saw the image of a somber faced wife who closed her eyes and bowed her head as soon as she was seated comfortably.  Michelle knows what is at stake.

Re-retraining is easy to support; so is streamlining the patent process.  Huh? Streamlining the patent process?  How did that get in there?  Oh well, I guess that’s good.

How did I do on the predictions made in It’s Joint Session Day.

He will ask for 300B
He asked for 447 Billion.                    3/4 credit
Not full credit because the number was off by 50%.

It will be about expansion of government               full credit
Points could be deducted for lack of mention of support for the states, but the professor decided that would be nit picking.

Infrastructure Bank             3/4 credit.
Full credit not given because the President didn’t identify his call for a private financing program by name.

Use of the S word (stimulus)            full credit plus a gold star
As prediced, the word was nowhere to be found.  Stimulus as a word is as dead as stimulus was in fact.

Stoking class resentment                   full credit
The only thing he missed was corporate jets

Only lip service for small business               zero credit
Obama’s plan would indeed provide some relief for small and medium size businesses.

So much for fun, now for the critique.  There is so much to say it will have to wait for the next post.

IT’S JOINT SESSION DAY

It’s eight o’clock in the morning on the day of  THE BIG JOBS SPEECH.  My neck is stuck way out.  I am going to predict what The Man is going and not going to say.  When I went to school, anything above 65% was passing.  Let’s see how I do on this one.

According to the advanced billing the raison d’être of the speech is to promote the creation of jobs.  But the speech itself will be about the support and expansion of government, both federal and state.  Obama will call for $300,000,000,000 (300 B) with much of it slated for infrastructure.  Infrastructure is in the government domain.  We heard this plan two years and a few billion dollars ago.  It didn’t work then and it won’t now.  Or as Yogi Berra might say – It didn’t work the first time and you can’t stop it from not working again.

”The definition of an Obama is someone who keeps repeating the same mistake over and over, each time expecting a different result.”      Al Einstein, from Brooklyn

Perhaps the President thinks it will work this time because the shovels have had more time to get ready.  Franklin Roosevelt’s shovels were ready.  He tried the infrastructure approach with his Works Progress Administration (WPA) and Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) Camps.  The result — unemployment stood at 15.3% at the end of 1936, four years after he was elected.  It was still 14.6% at the end of his second term, a full eight years in office.

Obama will urge Congress to establish an Infrastructure Bank, a sort of Fannie Mae for bridges and tunnels.

Another passel of dollars out of the 300B will be earmarked for distribution to states to prop up their finances, presumably to all 57 of them.  Favor will be given to those states in the poorest financial conditions because they need it most.  True, they need it most, but some would say they deserve it least.  Their circumstances are the consequence of their own governance.  Bailouts enable the perpetuation of faulty governance by one at the expense of the others.

“Stimulus”?  Obama will not use the word.  It is in the process of being replaced.  Give me a Mulligan on this one.  One or two off-hand references don’t count.

The President will not fail to stoke the fires of class resentment at some point in his talk.

Although medium and small business is the cradle of jobs, no more than lip service will be given to ease the obstacles that lay in the way their growth.

There’s more, but there’s also a deadline.  Let’s see how I do with the predictions given thus far.