Category Archives: Political polemics

COZY PAYS OFF FOR IMMELT AND GENERAL ELECTRIC

First came Government Motors, now we have Government Electric.
Hugo Chavez, eat your heart out.

Ponder this:

1. In the last two election cycles GE political contributions went 63% to Democrats.

2.GE owns NBC which, in partnership with Microsoft, owns MSNBC.

3. Obama said publicly that the reason he included India in his Asian tour was to secure a turbine contract for GE.

4. GE is not a bank. But GE received 340 B dollars from the TLGP (Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program), a bailout program for which only banks qualify. And yes, that’s a B.

5. No restrictions were put on CEO Jeffery Immelt’s salary as done with other recipients of bailout money.

6. GE paid no federal income tax in 2010, none.

7. GE received a 3.2 B dollar “tax benefit” in 2010, the year in which they paid no tax.

8. Why did GE get bailout money in the first place?

9. GE was in front of the line for a waiver of the burden of Obamacare.

GE is a leading maker of wind power turbines, solar panels and other green technologies that derive their profits from government subsidies not from market demand. Looking at Government Motors and Government Electric we get a glimpse of National Socialism. In a capitalist society, in a business, government may be your friend. In a National Socialist society government is your partner. Collusion and corruption become keys to your success. Competition is handled by selective regulation, not by superior innovation.

CHAOS IN LONDON, WILL IT COME HERE ?

The money is running out in Britain. When the money runs out, riots are what you get. If you hand feed a voracious wild animal, don’t expect gratitude for the handout or understanding when the food is gone.

When the growth rate of spending exceeds the growth rate of income the money will run out. It is not an opinion or philosophical point of view; its just arithmetic. When the only solutions the arithmetic allows, require drastic reductions in government largesse, there comes a point when the only choices are riots now or greater riots later. Here in America we are on the cusp of such a fulcrum point.

Here at Random Thots we have come up with a simple table that gets rid of all those zeros and provides some perspective we can understand. All the government figures are for the year 2010. We took a hypothetical family and gave them an income of 80,000 dollars. Then we calculated the proportion our family’s income was to the federal government’s total tax and other revenue. Finally, we applied the same proportion to other government figures like debt and total spending. Here is what we got.

Federal Revenues (billions)  2,217      Family income (dollars)        80,000
Federal spending                        4,472     Family spending would be   161,371
Federal debt                                13,561      Family debt would be           489,346
Annual interest                                414      Family equivalent                    14,940

Can you assure me the money will not run out? Can you assure me there will not be riots in the streets, right here in River City?

Addendum
You can relate other government financial figures for 2010 to an 80,000 dollar income by multiplying the federal number as expressed in billions by 36.0858. Actually 36 is close enough for government work.

We chose accrual accounting for the federal spending in the table. Accrual accounting records an expense when an obligation is incurred; cash accounting ignores the expense until the day it is paid. Under cash accounting federal spending was about 2,780 B and which would equate to 100,389 for the family, a much lower number, but also a much less realistic one.

WAR DECLARED !

David Brock, founder of Media Matters has declared war.

POLITICO reports:

The liberal group Media Matters has quietly transformed itself in preparation for what its founder, David Brock, described in an interview as an all-out campaign of “guerrilla warfare and sabotage” aimed at the Fox News Channel.

The new strategy, he [Brock] said, is a “war on Fox”

The group hired an executive from MoveOn.org to work on developing campaigns among News Corp. shareholders and also is looking for ways to turn regulators in the U.S., U.K., and elsewhere against the network.

The group will “focus on [News Corp. CEO Rupert] Murdoch and trying to disrupt his commercial interests —

[A Media Matters] memo says. “Fox News is not a news organization. It is the de facto leader of the GOP, and it is long past time that it is treated as such by the media, elected officials and the public.”

So, the First Amendment doesn’t cover Fox News because Fox News is not a member of the Press. And did you say “war”, David, and “sabotage”. Isn’t that the sort of language only Sarah Palin uses?

David Brock, dear reader, is a relative rarity, a conservative who converted to liberalism. There is an old saying “If you are not a liberal in your youth, you have no heart. If you are not a conservative in maturity, you have no head.” David, it would seem has neither, for he had no heart in his youth and has no head in his maturity.

HOW NOT TO FIGHT A WAR

Bullet points from a recent issue of the London Daily Mail

• Tensions with Britain as Gates rebukes UK government over suggestion Gaddafi could be assassinated
• French propose a new political ‘committee’ to oversee operations
• Germany pulls equipment out of NATO coalition over disagreement over campaign’s direction
• Italians accuse French of backing NATO in exchange for oil contracts
• No-fly zone called into question after first wave of strikes ‘neutralises’ Libyan military machine
• U.K. ministers say war could last ’30 years’
• Italy to ‘take back control’ of bases used by allies unless NATO leadership put in charge of the mission
• Russians tell U.S. to stop bombing in order to protect civilians – calls bombing a ‘crusade’

REMEMBER THIS GUY?

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) was a vociferous, even vicious, supporter of Obamacare in the House, but he wants a waiver for his city.

The waivers started with Obama’s favorite company, Jeffery Immelt’s General Electric and parent of MSNBC. Now more than a thousand waivers have been granted. Whole states and cities want out now that the bill has past and they know what is in it.

The video is a display of Weiner’s colorful style on the floor of the House. Please excuse the ad; it’s very short. I would not want this man as my next door neighbor.

AS OBAMA ABDICATES AMERICAS LEADERSHIP POSITION, WHO WILL STEP IN? FRANCE? RUSSIA? GABON?

The world has lost its strong voice. The Americans have abdicated their position of leadership. The action and inaction by our President is working toward bringing an end to the period of American exceptionalism that he believes never existed in the first place.

Europe is as rudderless and wimpish as ever. They took the lead in starting military action in Libya because we didn’t. Now they are shirking responsibility for it. Germany was like John Kerry, they were for it before they were against it. No one has any idea what to do next or how to carry out a final game plan. It doesn’t appear anyone even has a final game plan.

Obama justifies our participation with the same rationale the neo-cons employed to justify the invasion of Iraq, that is, to bring Democracy to a nation whose leader is a killer of his own people. That’s not a move to the center; it’s a move by a socialistic president in accordance with the agenda of elements of the far right.

The “conservative” token at the New York Times, Ross Douthout says our participation in the war in Libya is ”a stark departure from the Bush administration’s more unilateralist methods”. Yet Bush sought and received the clear approval of Congress before taking military action; while Obama never even consulted Congress, let alone seek their approval. Democrats are led in revolt by Denis Kucinich who has asked why Obama should not be impeached for acting alone. Douthout is the Times’ vision of condescension into conservative thought. So much for the New York Times.

Both Bush and Obama sought UN approval. Obama yielded to the limitations imposed by the UN as to how the world wants the war to be fought. .Bush acted in what he saw as the best interests of the United States, not in deference to the Security Council dominated by Russia and China.

At home, Obama assigns Joe Biden to deal with the Republicans on the budget while he shoots a few baskets and vacations in Rio de Janeiro.

COMPARE THIS

OBAMA, MARCH 19, 2011 ‘Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world’…

BUSH, MARCH 19, 2003 ‘American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger’… (By way of the Drudge Report)

HILLARY IN THE MIDDLE

Friday’s online Africa edition of the New York Times led with this headline, “Obama Takes Hard Line With Libya After Shift by Clinton”. (emphasis ours). The attack on Libya is being dubbed “Hillary’s War”.

Coincidentally, anti-war protests were held in several cities yesterday, including one at the White House where some were arrested. We say coincidentally because they were protesting the Iraq war, not the decision to launch an attack on Libya. Then it occurred to me why it is being framed as Hillary’s War. It’s the 2012 election, stupid!

The Make-Love-Not-War protesters are an important component of Obama’s core constituency. Anti-war, any war, voters are by no means limited to the radical element either. By deferring to the United Nations and the will of Europe, then allowing himself to be boxed in by Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama can claim the decision was taken away from him; that he had no choice but to authorize military action.

RANDOM THOTS, Mar 20, 2011

Headline from the Washington Times
DOJ to white male bullying victims: Tough luck

Obama’s Department of Justice has pledged to protect black students from bullying at school by whites under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but claims lack of authority to protect whites from bullying by blacks. The Civil Rights Act was not designed to protect whites from minorities.

Headline from Foreign Policy Magazine
European governments “completely puzzled” about U.S. position on Libya

On the No Fly Zone issue, Russia and Germany voted No, France and Great Britain voted Yes. The United States voted “present”. One begins to wonder if we have any president at all.

THE VOLT

Government Motors, Central Planning Department, Division of Collusion

From Forbes Magazine

The Chevrolet Volt is beginning to look like it was manufactured by Atlas Shrugged Motors, where the government mandates everything politically correct, rewards its cronies and produces junk steel.

This is the car that subsidies built. General Motors lobbied for a $7,500 tax refund for all buyers, under the shaky (if not false) promise that it was producing the first all-electric mass-production vehicle.

The Volt will only run 25 to 50 miles on a battery charge. Then a gasoline engine requiring premium grade fuel comes on to recharge the battery. Batteries do not last the life of the car. Replacements are exceedingly expensive and disposal presents an environmental hazard challenge. Sales were 326 in December, 321 in January, and just 281 in February.

Recently, President Obama selected General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt to chair his Economic Advisory Board. GE is awash in windmills waiting to be subsidized so they can provide unreliable, expensive power.

Consequently, and soon after his appointment, Immelt announced that GE will buy 50,000 Volts in the next two years, or half the total produced. Assuming the corporation qualifies for the same tax credit, we (you and me) just shelled out $375,000,000 to a company to buy cars that no one else wants so that GM will not tank and produce even more cars that no one wants. And this guy is the chair of Obama’s Economic Advisory Board?

And,

Consumer Reports got about 30 miles to the gallon of premium fuel; which, in terms of additional cost of high-test gas, drives the effective mileage closer to 27 mpg. A conventional Honda Accord, which seats 5 (instead of the Volt’s 4), gets 34 mpg on the highway, and costs less than half [the cost of a Volt] even with the tax break

Here we have a government that is building an overpriced car at a loss, paying people $7,500 to buy it and still can’t sell it. It’s the perfect example what you get when the free market system is replaced with central planning – a surplus of unwanted products, shortages elsewhere and industry/government collusion to make it all happen.

THE GREAT UNDECIDER

Hillary Clinton is tiring of Obama, the Great Undecider. And Clinton isn’t the only one. Look at this Rasmussen chart.

OBAMA'S APPROVAL RATING

You may recall Hillary’s famous question in the primaries – do you really want a community organizer to be answering when that red telephone rings at the President’s bedside at 3 o’clock in the morning? Well, she didn’t put it quite like that, but she was on the right track.

The UK Daily Mail asked a very good question a few days ago, in reference to the disaster in Japan. The question was “Where are the Americans?”

When the last big tsunami hit the low lying lands in the Indian Ocean, the United States military was dispatched immediately to help. Be it Kosovo, Kuwait, The Falkland Islands, the Berlin Airlift, the European Theatre in World War II or the great Indian Ocean tsunami,  America was there, post haste, and with all its might to help. Then came Egypt, Libya, the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and the Brits have posed a good question, “Where are the Americans?”

Another British paper, The Express, said today that Obama is,

“INEFFECTUAL, invisible, unable to honour pledges and now [responsible] for letting Gaddafi off the hook. Why Obama’s gone from ‘Yes we can’ to ‘Er, maybe we shouldn’t’…” (emphasis in the original)

It is no wonder Hillary is fed up. At this point one has to wonder why she stays on. It’s not for wealth and I don’t think it is any longer for power. Her aspirations for the high office are passed. Could it be that she is hanging in there for the good of the country? Could she be trying to salvage what she can of America’s respect in the world in face of its destruction by this creep we elected to lead us? I think she could. Hillary may be one of the last of that breed, an honorable Democrat. I never thought I would say that.