CHRISTIANS ARRESTED FOR HANDING OUT TRACTS IN PUBLIC

Three Christian men tried to offer Gospels of John to passersby on a public street in the vicinity of a Muslim festival. After 3 minutes a swarm of police converged on them, and arrested them.

From Power Line
The policeman’s order violated the First Amendment, so that conviction should be subject to reversal. It is good that a Michigan jury didn’t buy this plainly unconstitutional prosecution, but the story, taken as a whole, is sobering. These evangelists incurred expenses that must have been well into five figures, at a bare minimum, and on top of that had a legitimate fear of criminal conviction–all for engaging in activity that falls within the heart of the First Amendment’s protection. They were vilified, too; this is from the Detroit Free Press story that McCarthy refers to:

“It’s really about a hatred of Muslims,” [Dearborn Mayor Jack] O’Reilly said. “That is what the whole heart of this is. … Their idea is that there is no place for Muslims in America. They fail to understand the Constitution.”

That quote is so Orwellian as to leave one speechless. Passing out the Gospel of John reflects a “fail[ure] to understand the Constitution?” Does the Constitution ban Christianity? Some on the Left apparently think so.

FARRAKHAN MEETS WITH AHMADINEJAD

Louis Farrakhan and Mamoud Ahmadinejad spent some time together today at the New York Hilton. Obama did not join the pair. No reason was given by the White House for the President’s failure to meet with the two world leaders. It was a closed-door meeting but witnesses say there could be no doubt that they had lunch.

Some have speculated that Ahmadinejad, or A-Jad as Farrakhan calls him, offered a sub-caliphate position to the leader of the Nation of Islam. Negotiations hit a stalemate when A-Jad said the name “Panthers” would have to go. Panthers you see, are like big dogs and therefore unclean. For one thing, they never wash their feet.

It is unlikely Lou would have given up a nation for a sub job anyway. As he left the hotel one reporter counted 27 men accompanying the Minister, all dressed in black T-shirts, some carrying sticks. The reporter quipped “That’s quite an entourage. It’s just enough for 9 poling places.”

TIMES COVERS OBAMA ADMINISTRATION

It’s Monday morning. Michael Coates explosive testimony was Friday. See our Saturday post. As far as one can tell from Google, the editors at the print edition of the New York Times have not heard about it yet.

The NYT Online edition posted a short piece by the AP but without any comment of their own.

PRESS COVERAGE

Click the cartoon, then hold Ctrl and press the + key a few times to  enlarge it.

AD HOMINEM INC.

From today’s New York Times:

WASHINGTON — Democratic candidates across the country are opening a fierce offensive of negative advertisements against Republicans, using lawsuits, tax filings, reports from the Better Business Bureau and even divorce proceedings to try to discredit their opponents and save their Congressional majority.

Arthur Sulzberger

Litigation 101: “When the facts do not support your case, discredit the witness.”

For more than a year, a large team of researchers at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has been digging into the backgrounds of potential Republican candidates.

You can bet it has been more than a year. How about twenty? or thirty? The Times had not a word of condemnation of the tactic.

So far, many Republican candidates are forcefully defending themselves but not taking the bait by starting their own personal offensives. A review of television advertisements presented since Labor Day showed that the Republicans were basing theirs almost entirely on the records of Democrats on health care, the economic stimulus package and the first vote the Democrats cast when Congress convened in 2009: for making Nancy Pelosi speaker of the House.

Even many of the critical Republican advertisements produced by the candidates or the party are done with a softer touch.

It’s the same pattern that has prevailed for many years. But this year it looks like the differentiation may be greater than ever. That’s a good thing.

THE BANJER MAN

COATES TESTIMONY MADE PLAIN AND BOLD

Racism at the Department of Justice

Christopher Coates was the Section Chief for voting law enforcement at the Department of Justice (DOJ) headed by Eric Holder. Coates was served a subpoena ordering him to appear and give testimony before the United States Civil Rights Commission in the matter of the dismissal of the case against the Black Panthers who intimidated voters as they entered the poling place to cast their votes. However, Coates was ordered by his superiors at the DOJ not to comply with the subpoena.

Nevertheless, as he explains in his opening statement he says, he felt it to be his professional, ethical, legal and moral duty to comply with the subpoena and testify. In his testimony Coates spoke heroically but also carefully as befitting his circumstances. We have no such constraints

Here we go, this is Coates message made plain and bold. The division of the DOJ that is charged with enforcement of voting law violations, has a long standing policy of enforcing voting law violations only against white people. Racist attitudes are manifest both by flat refusal by attorneys and staff to participate in cases against blacks and by subsequent family harassment of one who did agree to participate during the Bush administration.

Anti-white racist views have permeated and dominated among attorneys and officials in the division of the DOJ responsible for voting act violations for many years. When Obama came to power these racists were elevated to more powerful positions in the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ.

During the Bush administration one case was brought against a black violator (Ike Brown). The very idea of bringing charges against a black person enraged the anti-white racists within the department and set up deep resentments that were pivotal in the decision to dismiss the Black Panther case. The dismissal had no grounds based on the factors of the case. The brief video often seen of the three Black Panthers did not convey the extent of their intimidation and harassment. You can read Coates full statement here. Near the end he gives a picture of their actions.

The message to black community organizations and Democratic operatives everywhere is that cases simply will not be brought against blacks for voting violations while Obama is President. Dare we hope that exposure of this scandal changes that message?

FANNIE and FREDDIE, FRANK and DODD

Central to the recent financial industry troubles are two Government Sponsored Entities (GSE’s) affectionately known as Fannie and Freddie. The formal first name for each is “Federal”, befitting their intimacy with federal folks like Frank and Dodd.

Both of these governmental failures (Fannie and Freddie, not Frank and Dodd) were conceived and created by Congress. They were not the progeny of entrepreneurial private industry.

As one of their own, Congress exempted them from the federal banking regulations applicable to the private sector. The Senate and House banking committees, recently chaired by Frank and Dodd, were given the responsibility for oversight of these, the legislatures own creations.

A shoe store buys shoes at one price and sells them for more. In like manner, F&F borrow money at one price and lend it for more. Their cost to borrow is dependent upon their credit rating. Their credit rating was set by agencies they hired and paid to set their credit rating. The rating agencies decided AAA would be appropriate. Is a picture beginning to form?

A sub-prime loan is by definition one of low creditworthiness. The government was mandating the making of loans to people ill-equipped to meet the payments. In 1999, 42% of mortgage loans were sub-prime. In 2000 Andrew Cuomo, appointed as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by Bill Clinton, mandated a quantum leap in the number of sub-prime loans that federally chartered banks must award. Forty-two percent was not enough bad loans to satisfy him.

Chairman Greenspan and the Federal Reserve kept interest rates lower than they might have been, which made borrowing attractive. It was generally thought the loans were guaranteed through F&F. Traditional lenders, backed, encouraged, even intimidated by the government enthusiastically joined the fray. The two GSE’s approved loans and provided the money with near total disregard for the ability of the borrower to pay. At the height of the bubble these Government Sponsored Entities were providing mortgage money to applicants called NINJA borrowers, no income, no job, no assets.

Eventually the bubble burst, as all bubbles do. Barney Frank said, read the fine print the loans are not guaranteed.

This was a government sponsored crisis. Don’t ever, ever let anyone convince you this fiasco was the result of anything, anything at all, other than government interference with the free market system.

HOW LOS ANGELES USED ITS STIMULUS MONEY

Plan #1 – Create 238 new government jobs in the Department of Public Works at a cost of nearly half a million dollars per job. That was a terrible plan.
The result – 46 new government jobs created at a cost of 2.4 million dollars each. The result was even worse than the plan.

Plan #2 – Create 26 new government jobs in the Department of Transportation at a cost of 1.5 million dollars per job. That was a terrible plan.
The result – 9 new government jobs created at a cost of 4.5 million dollars each. The result was even worse than the plan.

Plan #3 – Create private sector jobs.
There was no plan to create private sector jobs with the stimulus money received by the City of Los Angeles.

Rick Santelli, where are you? We need another rant. This time stress the “No Taxation” part of that original “Tea Party” in Boston to get a tax revolt started.

GM RESUMES POLITICAL DONATIONS

General Motors and US Steel were once icons of America, perhaps a bit like the World Trade Towers were. They grew and prospered with the nation through the Industrial Age. We were proud of them. Then they matured, grew old and stodgy. Steel remains sturdy but Motors went into a government nursing home. Hugo Chavez expressed his delight when that happened.

Now GM is majority owned and totally controlled by the Obama administration. You cannot buy a share of stock, which traded as low as 27 cents before trading stopped. All big corporations make political donations. Whether that is a good idea or not is open to debate. Of course there will be no debate because both parties are more or less equal recipients of corporate money. Democrats do get a little more, Republicans a little less. Whether that’s because business thinks Democrats are the best at government or it’s just a matter of getting the most bang for your buck is an open question.

To the credit of the Obama administration political contributions by General Motors were suspended when they took control of the company. But now they are resuming donations and indications are they will tilt Democratic; no surprise there. With government still the majority stockholder the move is premature and therefore improper. The conflict of interest is obvious. But we don’t think it is necessarily cause for great concern. We may need to change our opinion if the pattern of giving differs widely from general practice.

AIM FOR THE BACK OF THEIR HEADS

I once asked Howard Cosell what he considered to be the highlight of his career as a sportscaster. Howard had a great sense of humor. He answered “Reporting live on the consummation of Woody Allen’s marriage in the movie Bananas ”. I remembered the scene and remarked that I was surprised that the network allowed him to wear his jacket with the ABC logo in the film. He said, “They didn’t.”

Cosell was a great admirer of Mohammad Ali as a boxer. He said Ali always fought to win. I think it was Howard who first asked Ali where he aimed when throwing a punch. “For the back of the head.” Ali replied. Now that we have the progressives and gangster government swaying on the canvas, it is not the time to pull any punches. Aim for the back of their heads. VOTE!