Tag Archives: Obamacare

YOUR DOCTOR’S POSITION on OBAMACARE

What’s your doctor’s opinion of Obamacare?  Most doctors are tight-lipped with patients who ask where the doctor stands on Obamacare.  With political issues are as tense as they are today, any discussion has the potential of becoming a contentious one.  Doctors are there to heal, not to open wounds.  So we must look elsewhere for the answer to the question and we find your doctor’s opinion is decidedly negative.

The American Medical Association (AMA) was for more than 160 years the primary organization representing the interests of physicians in America.  It is the medical association most often quoted by the media.  The AMA supports Obamacare.  Doctors are leaving the AMA in droves.  Fully 47% cited their reason for discontinuing their membership was the association’s support for Obamacare.  After the exodus, only 17% of doctors practicing in America continue as members.  Now that’s a statement!

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) does take a haircut out of reimbursements to physicians for services rendered to Medicare and Medicaid patients.  But to say that this is the only reason for their opposition to the Obama/Pelosi plan would be to indict the whole fraternity of physicians as unable to keep their priorities straight.  Such is simply not the case.

Sally Pipes, writing for Forbes:

More than three times as many doctors believe that the quality of American health care will “deteriorate” rather than “improve” under ObamaCare.  Nine of ten physicians think ObamaCare will have a negative impact on their profession.

Another gripe is that nothing in ObamaCare addresses the problem of defensive medicine that physicians feel forced to do as protection against frivolous lawsuits.  There is no tort reform in the new law.  Physicians are there to heal, not to practice law.  They do not like putting their patients through procedures for legal reasons, procedures they would not do for health reasons.

So now you know.  Unless your doctor is one of a small minority, he has a very negative view of Obamacare.  But he will be slow to tell you that.

SUPREME COURT HEARINGS on OBAMACARE and the ARIZONA BORDER

Two highly significant issues are being prepared for presentation before the Supreme Court.  One is the United States Government vs. the State of Arizona.  The argument put forth by the Obama administration is that the federal government is given exclusive power to regulate immigration.  The question then is what power does a state have to protect its own people when the federal government imperils the states citizens by failing to enforce its own laws.

The second significant item is the constitutionality of Obamacare.  No case has actually been filed as yet but one is fully expected.  At one count, 38 states had joined or were considering joining in a suit to argue the health care plan is unconstitutional.  The issue here is the “individual mandate”.  The plan requires everyone to carry insurance or pay money to the government for failure to do so.  The crux of the argument lies in the characterization of that money.  Is it a tax or a penalty?

If it is a tax, Obamacare is more likely to be found constitutional under the clause that gives the federal government to levy tax for the national welfare of the people.  However, if it is a penalty, Obamacare is more likely to be found unconstitutional under the interstate commerce provisions which give Congress the power to regulate, but not to mandate interstate commerce.

The states will argue that the money is a penalty.  The Obama administration will argue it is a tax.  It would be interesting if President Obama were to be called to testify about his assertions to the American people that his plan would actually save money and therefore no new taxes would be required to pay for it.  That won’t happen, of course.

REMEMBER THIS GUY?

Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-NY) was a vociferous, even vicious, supporter of Obamacare in the House, but he wants a waiver for his city.

The waivers started with Obama’s favorite company, Jeffery Immelt’s General Electric and parent of MSNBC. Now more than a thousand waivers have been granted. Whole states and cities want out now that the bill has past and they know what is in it.

The video is a display of Weiner’s colorful style on the floor of the House. Please excuse the ad; it’s very short. I would not want this man as my next door neighbor.

OBAMA LOSES ONE IN COURT

Many parallels have drawn between Franklin D. Roosevelt and Barack H. Obama. Now there is another one. Both had key provisions of their transformative programs struck down by the courts. FDR’s National Recovery Act (NRA) was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court. Now the core of Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, has been declared unconstitutional by a U.S. District Court.

Of course, a District Court is not the final word and only one provision of the PPACA (Obamacare) is affected. But remember what Obama said when he spoke to labor union members, “single payer is the goal.” The District Court has struck at the heart and shattered Obama’s dream. If it goes to the Supreme Court of the land, the President can count on the ladies to lean his way. The ladies, of course are Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan. (A somewhat motley group, no?)

If Obama gets his way with the ladies and SOTUS reverses TUSDC (The U.S. District Court) there is still 2013. If the courts do not provide relief from Obamacare the legislature can change the law.

Just in the last few days, Obama has lost one to the Democrats, one to the courts and one to Bill Clinton. When we say the “Dude is Done”, the dude is done.

DEMS TO PELOSI – GO, YOU HAVE DONE ENOUGH HARM ALREADY

Defeated Democrats Implore Pelosi to Leave. Read it here.

A reasonable leader would find the grace to take defeat and retire with pride. Pride for what she did? Yes, pride. We abhor her goals and her methods. We detest what she accomplished. But she could have rejected us as we have her and walked into her own world with the knowledge that she did what presidents before her could not. For what we call Obamacare was named after its father but it was Nancy who gave it birth.

Now she fights on after the war has been lost and in her stubbornness turns on those who made her accomplishments possible only months ago. Radicals are unreasonable by nature. Thankfully they tend to be internally divisive as well. The radicals are scattered and only radicals will support her now. Nancy is done.

As far as she is concerned our time for anger is passed. Neither do we have time for pity.There is too much we have to do now that the sun is coming back out.

For instance:

CORPORATE HEALTH CARE PLANS ARE ON THEIR DEATH BED

In our Oct 12th post, Obamacare is Working as Planned, we pointed out that the President’s objective is the elimination of private insurance altogether. We included a video of Barack Obama declaring very clearly that single player is the goal. Single means “only” and the “only payer” is of course the federal government. The complete elimination of private health insurance companies is his goal.

One thing the President knows about economics is that he can destroy an industry by raising its costs and taking away its customers. It’s called the double whammy. The Associated Press issued this progress report:

AP WASHINGTON – Oct 24, 2010
The new health care law wasn’t supposed to undercut employer plans that have provided most people in the U.S. with coverage for generations.

But last week a leading manufacturer told workers their costs will jump partly because of the law. Also, a Democratic governor laid out a scheme for employers to get out of health care by shifting workers into taxpayer-subsidized insurance markets that open in 2014.

While it’s too early to proclaim the demise of job-based coverage, corporate number crunchers are looking at options that could lead to major changes.

“The economics of dropping existing coverage is about to become very attractive to many employers, both public and private,” said Gov. Phil Bredesen, D-Tenn.

You must forgive the Associated Press for saying “it wasn’t supposed to”. The AP editors don’t read Random Thots and thus are not fully informed. McDonalds and AT&T were first to say, that due to the new law, they would need to drop or seriously curtail health insurance for employees in order to remain viable and competitive. Senator Waxman threatened to haul the executives into Washington for an investigative hearing by the Senator’s committee. Ultimately a deal was cut and these two companies have exemption from the law.

What’s next? If two are exempted, why not two hundred? or two thousand? That will never do, so more exemptions are unlikely. That means employers will drop the insurance, pay the additional tax (called a “fine” for legal reasons) and health care coverage will default to the government. No major company wants to go next. But one will, and then an avalanche will follow.

In his promise to the labor union membership, Obama said “It won’t happen overnight. It may take 10 years or more.” It looks like the plan is running ahead of schedule.

OBAMACARE IS WORKING AS PLANNED

In Connecticut, Aetna Insurance petitioned the State regulators to allow a 24.7% rate increase to cover the increased cost of providing coverage under Obamacare. They were granted a 14.2% increase for large group plans and an 18% increase for small group plans. Similar rate hikes are being granted in other states. Facing this magnitude of cost increase several companies have announced they will no longer be providing health coverage for their workers. These employees will end up on the government plan by default. This is Obamacare working as planned.

The squeeze is on. Insurers need to raise prices for survival, employers need to control costs to remain internationally competitive. The pragmatic solution for business is to default to single payer government coverage. For insurance companies the path to survival is to diversify away from providing health care coverage. In time, at the end of the struggle the government plan will be the only man left standing. Pelosi, et al, knew this consequence was built into the bill. Whatever else was there didn’t much matter.

THE STUDENT LOAN PROGRAM

BOSTON (Associated Press) Sept 17, 2010

Citigroup Inc. is exiting the private student loan business, as the government changes the playing field by making Uncle Sam the primary lender to students.

The government’s growing role is cutting out private lenders from much of the business of financing higher education, prompting lenders to decide whether to exit the business entirely or scale back.

Citibank is just the first of the major private sector lenders who will be leaving the student loan business. It is the fruit of Obama’s plan to increase government control over colleges and universities by controlling the purse strings.

Wall St Journal, Sept 12, 2009

The Obama plan calls for the U.S. Department of Education to move from its current 20% share of the student-loan origination market to 80% on July 1, 2010, when private lenders will be barred from making government-guaranteed loans. The remaining 20% of the market that is now completely private will likely shrink further as lenders try to comply with regulations Congress created last year. Starting next summer, taxpayers will have to put up roughly $100 billion per year to lend to students.

And

If the feds are now making and owning all such loans, expect default rates to soar. When the government hires contractors to collect on its loans, it pays them for simply calling the borrower, regardless of the result. Private lenders, on the other hand, make money from a performing loan and have a greater incentive to do careful underwriting and aggressive collection.

Default rate by students of Hillsdale College, which accepts no government loan students, is under 2%. The current default rate by students in  the government loan program is over 30%.

Wall St Journal again,

[P]arents will soon have no choice beyond a Washington bureaucracy to borrow money for their college-bound children, and taxpayers will pay a fortune for the privilege.

They will have Hillsdale College and possibly no other.

You will remember how difficult it was to find out what was included in the health care bill. There was one excuse after another. The weakest was it was too long and to complex to be understood. It was said to be 3,000, 2, 000, 1,800 and 2,500 pages long. Nancy Pelosi said we will not know what is in it until it becomes law. She was right about that.

Obama had promised pending bills would be published on the Internet for public review if he were elected. He promised, no more secrecy, debates will be open and broadcast on CSPAN. But there was no timely posting of the health care bill and Obama denied CSPAN access to debates. When John McCain sought openness as promised, the President replied with a ridiculing laugh, “That was the campaign, John. The campaign is over.” The gall of the man!

What were they trying to hide? For one thing, the government’s shutting of private lenders out of the business of making student loans. I hear a question coming from some naïve soul in the corner, what do student loans have to do with health care?

Wall St Journal, Mar 25, 2010

This plan is hitched to ObamaCare for several reasons. For one, the student-loan takeover could never attract a filibuster-proof 60 votes if it had to pass as a stand-alone measure, and it might not even get 51. The government’s bogus accounting for student loans also creates the illusion that this bill will help save enough money in the first five years to protect the ObamaCare provisions from Republican challenges under budget rules. Remember, budget reconciliation is supposed to be about preventing deficits, so it takes a mother lode of accounting gimmicks to claim that the bill’s spending binge is a cost-saver.

Does that answer your question, sir? It is the way Washington works, and it is time we change it. Remember, vote in November.

DEMS DESOLIDATE

Sinking Solidarity Within the Democratic Party

Democratic candidates are spending three times more advertising their stance against Obamacare than they are in support of it. Read more here.

Thirty-one Congressional Democrats sign a petition to Nancy Pelosi (D San Francisco) urging continuation of all the Bush tax cuts. Read more here.

Tennessee Democrat and Congressional candidate Brett Carter is asking Nancy Pelosi (D, San Francisco) to step down for the good of the Democratic party. Read more here.

Democrats expel Democrats from Democratic Party event. “It ain’t about Nancy. It’s about Black people”. Read more here.

1099 TAX REPORTING FIASCO

1099 Form filing requirement is nightmare for small corporations

Imagine you own a small incorporated business, perhaps a landscaping business and you rent a de-thatcher for a couple of days, or perhaps it’s a donut shop and you have a new sign painted for the front door. The Obamacare law requires you to prepare and issue 1099 Tax Reporting forms reporting to the IRS that the rental agency and the sign painter received money from you. In fact you must report to the IRS anyone who received 600 dollars or more from you during the year.

It is preposterous! It so onerous it would be nearly impossible to comply with it. In fact, there is no way it will be complied with. This provision must be repealed. Republicans insist and Democrats acknowledge it cannot stand. Republicans say repeal it. Democrats insist on replacing it. Stalemate. The Democrats don’t want simply to repeal it because it was designed to raise 19 billion in new income taxes.

The Dems were right, we would never have known what is in the Obamacare bill if it had not become law.

Bob B

Bookmark and Share