Category Archives: Political polemics

OBAMA RETURNS TO COMMUNITY ORGANIZING – IN WISCONSIN

The Washington Post:  Friday, February 18, 2011

MADISON, WIS. – President Obama thrust himself and his political operation this week into Wisconsin’s broiling budget battle, mobilizing opposition on Thursday to a Republican bill that would curb public-worker benefits and planning similar protests in other state capitals.

Obama accused Scott Walker, the state’s new Republican governor, of unleashing an “assault” on unions in pushing emergency legislation that would change future collective-bargaining agreements that affect most public employees, including teachers.

The president’s political machine worked in close coordination Thursday with state and national union officials to get thousands of protesters to gather in Madison and to plan similar demonstrations in other state capitals.

The emphasis is ours. The President did not just favor on side; he joined the fight. “Wisconsin” is not an external threat. It’s a legitimate domestic dispute within a sovereign state. The federal government has no business taking sides. If the President has any role at all it is to bring calm, to mediate. But Obama comes to agitate. It’s a crisis not to waste.

To this day, and to the discredit of all media the art of community organizing is not well known. Look at WaPo’s third paragraph again. “political machine worked…close coordination…with union officials…get [organize] protesters to gather…plan similar demonstrations.” This is not the work of resolving disputes. It’s the work of feeding disputes. It’s the prime function of a community organizer.

Barack comes home.

“Hello! Michelle! I’m home. Where are you? I have something exciting to tell you.”

“I’m right here, in the den, honey.”

“Ahh, Michelle. What an exciting day I had. This Wisconsin thing. It’s like the good old days, only on a grander scale. Easier, too. We didn’t even have to create an issue. This one just fell in our laps, Michelle.”

“Peter was right, Barack.”

Now who would Peter be in this imaginary tale? Barack would know. It’s Peter Dreier, the author of “Socialist Incubators” (community organizatations) and of “The Case for Transitional Reform” (advancing socialism through the electoral system). Dreier convened a panel on community organizations at the Socialist Scholars Conference held at Cooper Union hall in honor of the 100th year of Karl Marx’s death. Obama attended that conference and went into community organizing immediately thereafter.

We quote from Stanley Kurtz’ book “Radical-In-Chief”:

Dreier’s overall strategy was to first establish quasi-socialist institutions at the heart of capitalist society – ACORN’s role in the banking system very much fit the bill. In the short run, these de facto socialist groups would push society toward gradual “democratic” change. In the long run, perhaps, they’d serve as the vanguard of a revolution.

The second part of Dreier’s strategy was to inject “unmanageable strains into the capitalist system, strains that precipitate an economic and/or political crisis,” by which Dreier meant a “revolution of rising entitlements” that “cannot be abandoned without undermining the legitimacy of the capitalist class.” In the short run, Dreier said, “the process leads to expansion of state activity and budgets, and… to fiscal crisis in the public sector. In the long run, it may give socialist norms an opportunity for extension or at least visibility.”

Peter Dreier was a professor of urban affairs at Occidental College when Obama attended Occidental. Peter served on Barack’s urban policy task force during the 2008 campaign. Barack knew exactly who Peter was when Michelle said “Peter was right.”

ANDREW SULLIVAN DOESN’T LIKE OBAMA’S BUDGET

Obama’s new budget has aroused some of the honest folks on the left. Andrew Sullivan writes The Daily Dish for the left leaning publication known as The Atlantic. Sullivan has been an ardent supporter of President Barack Obama. We quote from his article covering the 2011 budget. The article is entitled “Obama To The Next Generation: Screw You, Suckers”.

[Members of the Senate] have to lead, because this president is too weak, too cautious, too beholden to politics over policy to lead. In this budget, in his refusal to do anything concrete to tackle the looming entitlement debt, in his failure to address the generational injustice, in his blithe indifference to the increasing danger of default, he has betrayed those of us who took him to be a serious president…

To all those under 30 who worked so hard to get this man elected, know this: he just screwed you over. He thinks you’re fools. Either the US will go into default because of Obama’s cowardice, or you will be paying far far more for far far less because this president has no courage when it counts. He let you down.

All of us who took Obama’s pitch as fiscally responsible were duped.

Sullivan recognizes that our debt crisis is due the costs of Medicare, Social Security and other entrenched programs like that, all considered to be “non-discretionary entitlements“. Yet the President’s budget leaves the so-called “entitlements” untouched. We expected as much. Apparently Sullivan did not. But he is learning.

BARACK OBAMA AS CENTRIST

The most recent step in Obama’s makeover as a centrist was his olive branch visit to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. He prefaced his speech by remarking that the White House and the Chamber might have gotten off to a better start if someone had brought over a fruitcake. There wasn’t much laughter.

Commerce is the engine of prosperity for the nation. His audience was a gathering of drivers of that engine. Obama stood before the group and told them they must take money that rightfully belongs to the owners of companies and give it to the workers. Here are the words he used to say it.

“If we’re fighting to reform the tax code and increase exports, the benefits cannot just translate into greater profits and bonuses for those at the top. They have to be shared by American workers, who need to know that opening markets will lift their standard of living as well as your bottom line,”

The two tenets most essential to an efficient free market society are the Right to Private Property and the Rule of Law. With just two sentences Obama undermined both of them. If that’s considered to be centrist it must be because it is somewhere in the middle between Marx and Engels.

At the end of the speech one listener is said to have turned to his neighbor and said of the speech, “If that’s his olive branch, I would rather have the fruit cake.”

SEVERE ENERGY CRISIS HITS SOUTHWESTERN TIER

Southern California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas are suffering severe shortages of electricity and natural gas. Hospital administrators in Texas are screaming because even hospitals are not excluded from rolling blackouts planned by electric utility providers. The crisis is but a preview of what will be in store if liberal energy policies prevail. Mexico promised to add power to the grid to help us in our hour of need. Then they reneged. In times of stress when you find out who your friends are.

Obama is taking the heat. The pun wasn’t intended, but now that it’s in print it makes you think,….perhaps he has taken our heat. He placed a moratorium on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico against the explicit advice of his own panel of experts. It was a high profile issue, not a time to contravene expert advice. So the administration changed the advice.

The panel of experts signed a letter exposing the fraud. The main stream press didn’t seem to notice. We reported it in our post First Oil Rig Sails Away .

The drilling ban was lifted, but only after some of the big drilling rigs were gone.

The president canceled the granting of new exploration leases, partially restored after the damage was done. The permitting process has started anew. It takes from five to ten years of feeding the legal profession to go from getting the lease to dropping a bit to start the hole.

Then there’s coal. If we can get some heat we can make electricity. The land has plenty of coal and it burns. But Obama promised to make it economically unfeasible to build a new coal fired energy plant. Darn! Let’s hope he is not a man of his word.

Perhaps we should just build a fence all along the Canadian border. That’s where the cold is coming from, isn’t it?

AMERICA’S SPUTNIK MOMENT

BRITISH TRIDENT MISSILE ARMED SUBMARINE

Her Majesty’s underwater ship. Russia want’s to know her secrets (the ship’s, not Her Majesty’s). And we are going to rat them out. Russia wants some secrets, Obama wants a treaty, it sounds like a deal. We get something; they get something. That’s the Chicago way.

We are selling out a 200 year-long faithful friend and ally for a lousy signature from a 200 year-long deceitful enemy. It isn’t even a good deal!

Obama must be replaced. Somehow we have to show our friends we made a mistake. The American people chose Obama. The American people are kicking Britain in the shins, by proxy. We must revoke the proxy and apologize for our error. We must.

Bob B

PRESIDENT OBAMA SHUTS OUT THE PRESS, ALL THE PRESS

Courtesy of The FishBowl, Washington, DC.

After being shut out of the President’s Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, the White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) appealed  to the White House for press corps access to an event that’s been called one of the President’s most important foreign policy priorities for almost a year – the signing of the START Treaty. The letter from the news group reads in part:

On behalf of the White House Correspondents Association we are writing to protest in the strongest possible terms the White House’s decision to close the President’s Cabinet meeting on Tuesday and his signing of the START Treaty today to the full press pool.

And

Prior to the President’s statement Tuesday night, the press corps had not received a substantive update from the White House all day on the situation in Egypt. In addition, the press corps did not have an on-camera briefing, or an off-camera gaggle, with you yesterday to ask the White House about its decision-making process during this major foreign policy crisis. Now for two straight days the full press pool is being shut out of events that have typically been open and provided opportunities try to ask the President a question.

Obama campaigned on openness. All important hearings were going to be broadcast on CSPAN. He broke that promise. CSPAN was denied access to the most important hearings of the Obama administration’s two years in office. Obama pledged that every bill would be posted on the internet at least 5 days before it was signed to give the public time to read them and and make their opinions known to their representatives. He failed to keep that promise as well. Even members of Congress, Republican members, were denied copies of the final bill in time to analyze what they contained before voting on them.

We have commented before, on the pre-selection process this president uses to choose which members of the press are going to be allowed to present a question when the president concludes his opening remarks. The format retains the appearance of the spontaneity, but  spontaneity no longer not exists.

We have seen Fox News barred from a general press event until the other agencies took a strong stance in defense of Fox and the Fourth Estate.

No other president in history of this great nation has been less open and more controlling of the press than Barack Obama.

Houston, we have a problem.

BEATING A DEAD HORSE DEPARTMENT

This item could have easily been titled ”Joke of the Week”. Here is one sentence from the New York Times’ announcement of Olbermann’s final break with MSNBC. It’s a real howler.

“Mr. Olbermann’s outspoken, and sometimes controversial, support of liberal positions and Democratic candidates redefined MSNBC from a neutral news channel to one that openly offered a voice to viewers on the left, much as Fox News has done for conservatives.”

Sometimes controversial? The Times needs a good thesaurus so they could find words like “frequently” or “always” or “highly”. And controversial? Sarah Palin is controversial. Keith Olbermann is beyond controversial, he is mean spirited. At least that’s what the Times might have said. I would have said disgusting.

Olbermann redefined MSNBC, from a neutral channel? Do the editors think MSNBC was politically neutral before he came on board? Apparently so. Makes your head spin, doesn’t it. It takes a very strong pair of liberal colored glasses to see MSNBC as neutral, even before Olbermann.

“Openly offered a voice to viewers on the left” So that’s why the ratings were so high (a bit of sarcasm there), the left finally had a voice, and an open voice at that. Out of the closet, finally!

Olbermann and MSNBC are much like Fox. Really? Perhaps we should get a television set for them as well as a thesaurus so they could actually watch Fox before equating it to MSNBC.

So much for the New York Times. Now I feel the need to explain Dead Horse. You see, there has been a lot of reporting on the Olbermann affair, at Random Thots and elsewhere. And it’s over. He’s gone. Commenting further, such as I have done here is like hitting a horse that has died in an effort to get him up, a useless endeavor. I was not suggesting violence against horses or people. I did not intend to imply any harm should come to the mann. I did not mean to compare Olbermann to a dead horse. If I were to compare him to a horse it would be a live one, and not the whole horse, of course.

I do not believe horses should be beaten, not even dead ones. I am a good and gentle person. I’m just not a Democrat.

 

RANDOM THOTS

OLBERMANN’S FALL FROM DISGRACE
Upon reading something about a 30 million dollar contract, my thought was… hate pays, but only in money. If reports are correct, Olbermann’s personality is the same off-camera as on. When off-camera his anger radiates in all directions we’re told, not just toward the political right but to staff and management as well. Keith Olbermann, by all appearances, is an angry and hateful man. Hate eats a person from the inside out. Hate is cancer of the soul.

Bush and Palin were favorite targets of the MSNBC star. These are two obviously very happy people. Olbermann is not. Targets of hate can rise above it because it comes at them from without. Haters are stuck in their own misery because one cannot rise above that which dwells within.

IMMELT’S REWARD
President Obama chose Schenectady for his nationally broadcast “jobs” speech. Schenectady has long been a home to General Electric. Jeffrey Immelt is Chairman and CEO of GE. The company is dominant in the city because it is the largest and oldest of the major employers in the region.

As he spoke, Obama highlighted what he had done to create jobs for MSNBC. Correction – for GE, the owner of MSNBC. In fact he said, the very reason he went to India was to negotiate a contract that will bring 1200 new jobs to General Electric’s manufacturing operation in this city in upstate New York.

Why Schenectady? Why GE? One cannot help but wonder, was it Immelt’s reward?

THE ZINNS OF SCIENCE

The noted revisionist historian Howard Zinn taught his students that a historian’s responsibility was to the future, not the past. To Howard Zinn, framing history in a manner that promotes a better world was a higher calling than recording history as it actually happened. Exactly what that better world may be is, of course, in the eye of the historian. For Zinn, it was socialism. The idea of adjusting history or any other truth to further an ideology is a variation of the rationale that “the ends justify the means”.

The same moral relativism is seen today in the science world. Here’s a sampling of quotes that illustrate the fact.

“We have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we may have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
Stephen Schneider (leading advocate of the global warming theory in an interview for Discover magazine, Oct 1989)

In other words, when your findings don’t support your premise, fudge the findings.

“Scientists who want to attract attention to themselves, who want to attract great funding to themselves, have to (find a) way to scare the public . . . and this you can achieve only by making things bigger and more dangerous than they really are.”
Petr Chylek (Professor of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, commenting on reports by other researchers that Greenland’s glaciers are melting. Halifax Chronicle-Herald, August 22, 2001)

If the truth doesn’t get you what you need, then fabricate and exaggerate.

“No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits…. Climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
Christine Stewart, former Minister of the Environment of Canada
Quote from the Calgary Herald, 1999

The story doesn’t need to be true. We can still use it to spread the wealth around.

Stewart is a politician not a scientist so she can’t be accused of professional fraud. But it reveals that just the fear of warming serves a purpose in and of itself. The validity of the fear is of no concern to those who see its usefulness in advancing a socialist agenda.

Science politicized is science polluted. Science polluted isn’t science at all.

LIEBERMAN ACCORDING TO THE NEW YORK TIMES

One thousand and fourteen words, and not one of them favorable in this announcement by the New York Times.

Okay, one could argue that “…voters once embraced Mr. Lieberman, the son of a liquor store owner who entered politics as a reform-minded Democrat in 1970, for his folksy ways and his common-sense approach to issues” was complimentary. But at the big city paper, “folksy ways” is the way they say unsophisticated and “common sense” means not very intellectual.

That may have been a bit vague, however, the Times was perfectly clear two sentences later. Quoting a prominent Democrat  they wrote of Lieberman’s pending departure, “It’s the first thing he’s done in 10 years to make Connecticut Democrats completely happy.”

It will have been 24 years of honorable service when he walks out that door, and all they can say to him is we are glad you are gone. Even the Mafia after all, gives one a parting.