Category Archives: Political polemics

FROM the OFFICES of the PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES

Executive Order 13589 — Promoting Efficient Spending

Section 1.  Policy.  My Administration is committed to cutting waste in Federal Government spending and identifying opportunities to promote efficient and effective spending….

As such, I have pursued an aggressive agenda for reducing administrative costs since taking office and, most recently, within my Fiscal Year 2012 Budget.  Building on this effort, I direct agency heads to take even more aggressive steps to ensure the Government is a good steward of taxpayer money.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
November 9, 2011.

   *****************************************************************

FROM the OFFICES of the WASHINGTON POST

It looks like Michelle and Barack will be flying to Hawaii each on their own planes.

PORTRAITS OF AMERICA

The New York Times featured a front page story in last Sunday’s edition entitled The American Archipelago, an obvious take-off on the Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn.  Solzhenitsyn’s book is the depressingly accurate first hand story of life and death in the vast system of forced labor camps in the Soviet Union where millions died at the hands of Josef Stalin.  The Times author compares our current prison system and finds parallels with the atrocities of a heartless totalitarian dictator like Josef Stalin.

Please note this is a front page story in the leading newspaper in all of America and read around the world.  To a citizen in Europe for instance, the New York Times is the most knowledgeable and the most reliable authority on life as it really is in the United States.  They may not trust our government but they do trust the New York Times.

“Keep America American” may not be a very catchy slogan, but who can condemn the idea of seeking to preserve the great American culture?  Chris Matthews did by characterizing the Mitt Romney slogan as call for return to the days of the Ku Klux Klan.  Matthews’ vision of the country of his birth must be similar to that of a certain Reverend who preached at a certain church in Chicago.

The New York Times equates our imprisonment of a few terrorists who plotted to kill us with Stalin’s policy of committing large numbers of his own people to death solely for the purpose of solidifying his own power.  Matthews’ message on MSNBC is that Americanism is best exemplified by a hooded mob of racist lynchers.  With reporting like this, it is no wonder that Fox News has found such success.

DAMN THE TRUTH – DENY, DENY, AND THEN DENY IT AGAIN

 According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a government agency, the unemployment rate for 2008 was 5.6 percent and rising.  Obama said he would keep the oceans of the unemployed from rising, and the economy would start to heal, or something like that.  As anyone in partisan politics knows, unemployment continued its rise to 10.2  percent and only recently retreated below 9 to 8.6 percent.  Unemployment has grown by roughly 50 percent during the nearly three years of Obama’s term in office, two with Democratic control of the House and Senate.  This is the biggest obstacle facing the Democrats for the 2012 election.  They know it; they know it very well.

What do you call the willful suspension of personal integrity, honesty and common civility?  Debbie Wasserman Schultz.  All you need to know to judge who holds the moral high ground is to compare this woman the Democrats have chosen to head the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to anyone the Republicans have ever chosen to head the RNC.  Yes, the Republicans have had their scoundrels too, but none of them raised the needle on the obnoxious meter to the level of DWS, not even Howard Dean.

Watch the video.  Judge for yourself.

WHEN YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO, YOU DO WHAT YOU DO KNOW…OR PLAY GOLF

If President Obama knew how to create jobs he would be creating jobs because it would further his chances for re-election.  If his administration had a record of accomplishment the President would run on his record.  But he can’t because they haven’t.  The Messiah aura is extinguished.  Hope and Change is not a re-usable product.  And so, in such a situation what is a President to do to seek re-election?

A president does what he knows and plays every card he has, even if his best card is no higher than the Jack of Clubs.  Therefore, we are seeing an all out class war and a great deal of chest thumping reminding us that Osama bin Laden was found and executed on the President’s watch.  President Barack Obama may not know that Austrian is not a language or that the U.S. has only 50 states, but he does know how to use class warfare to demagogue his way into winning an election.

With respect to bin Laden, the real kudos, go of course, to the members of the military who actually did the job.  They are our heroes, not the people who ordered or authorized it.  Nevertheless, Obama should be given credit for his contribution to this success.

With no winnable path available on the high ground, the low ground is the only path left to the Democrats.  We yearn for a Reagan but it may be what we really need is a Lincoln.

THE TEA PARTY vs. THE OCCUPIERS and OTHER RANDOM THOTS

There is no comparison.
The Tea Party members stand for less federal spending, less federal debt, less government restriction, more personal liberty, more growth and more jobs.  As a group they are peaceful, familial, respectful of private property, employed and proud of their American heritage.

The Occupy movement still hasn’t decided what it stands for as a group.  Members have taken stands against corporate bailouts, unequal wealth, capitalism, Israel, anything military and the notion that there is any reason whatever to be proud of their country.  They have asked for bailouts for individuals, free college tuition, higher taxes on other people, (the demonstrators themselves pay little or none), and redistribution of the wealth of others unto themselves.  Their methods are disruptive, sometimes destructive and occasionally violent and frequently illegal.  They show disrespect for the American flag, private property and the rule of law.  They have been unable to control criminal activity within their own group.

Our president expresses support for the Occupiers and holds Tea Party members in contempt.  Until Barack Obama we had never had a President like this.

Where’s the swamp?
The ripest department for corruption in any town is the housing department.  If you have ever dealt with one you know how involved the permitting and inspection process can be.  It is rich with opportunities for those in power to ‘earn’ a little income on the side.  The big opportunities are in the realm of awards to private contractors for municipal construction and other town services.  This is by no means an indictment of these departments as a whole for malfeasance, but where corruption does exist this is where you are most likely to find it because it’s the most fertile ground.

At the federal level, the equivalent that comes to mind is infrastructure programs.  Think about it.

More Republicans should play chess.
Republicans in Washington fell into a trap because they didn’t anticipate the Democrat’s future moves.

The Republicans were set up when they supported a temporary suspension of the payroll tax.  Now the Democrats want to extend it and the Republicans do not.  Obama has been given ammunition for his class warfare battle.  Now Republicans “want to increase taxes on the working man but never on the rich”.

Continuing the payroll tax suspension also plays into the Presidents plan to spread the wealth.  As it stands, the working man is contributing nothing to fund the Social Security he will collect.  Obama wants to keep it that way.

THATCHER AT HER BEST

“A common European currency is a preposterous idea and we will have none of it!”  Such was the steadfast position of Margaret Thatcher’s government.  For sheer entertainment the proceedings in the British House of Commons have no peer in government.  The Prime Minister stands up and speaks briefly.  The Sub-Prime Ministers moan loudly.  When the Prime pauses, the Sub-Primes leap from their seats, some of them that is.  They plop down as fast as they pop up, like bubbles in a boiling stew.

One minister refers to another as Right and Honorable and then lambastes him (or Her) with the sharpest sort of insults and both sides have a hearty laugh.  They talk about each other, in front of each other, but not to each other.  Like two kids tattling on one another to their mom, the ministers tell everything to a man wearing a silly looking wig.  A strange lot, the British.

The issues under siege in this clip are, first, the European Union which Thatcher sees as a looming federation robbing the individual nations of their sovereignty bit by bit, and secondly, the specter of outright Socialism.

USELESS IDIOTS

Saul Alinsky is dead.  So is Occupy Wall Street.  Or if it’s not dead it is in the throes of dying.  Alinsky taught revolution as a three act play.  Act I is to gain respect.  That does not happen by defecating on police cars and shutting down subway stations at rush hour.

In the first couple of weeks of OWS, the movement was seen as counterpoint to the Tea Party.  It may have even been intended as such by its founders, whomever they may be.  There were people with honest gripes about the lack of jobs, crony capitalism, ill conceived bailouts, and stimulus that didn’t stimulate.  However, given the obsession of the OWS leadership with democracy and endless “General Assemblies” the movement never found a unified direction.  You can’t steer a ship with a hundred rudders in the hands of a hundred helmsmen each with a different idea of which direction forward is.

Gradually the cross section of ordinary Americans who really did want jobs and better government withdrew.  They left the tent cities to the shower-less and the anarchists whose idea of social justice is – why make it if you can just take it?  This is exactly the type of behavior Saul Alinsky sought to correct.  Without effective leadership they are proving to be no more than a band of useless idiots.

WHO ARE THE PEOPLE WORSHIPPING AT THE ALTER OF MATERIALISM AND GREED ?

A combination of the success of the free market system and gradual increase of government largess has all but eliminated depression style poverty.  The poverty argument no longer engenders the same level of anger when those classed as poor have cell phones and iPads, drive cars, own homes and still pay no income tax.

Today’s anger is not about poverty; it’s about riches.  The Wall Street protesters are not fighting poverty; they are protesting the unequal distribution of wealth.  They are protesting the fact that some people have more than they do and they want some of it.  All you need to do to see why the Occupiers have less is to examine a cross section of them and compare it a cross section of Tea Party types, or upper East-side New York liberals for that matter.

All the rich want to do is keep some of their own money and pay out the rest in taxes and give some to charity.  They don’t want to take money from someone else just because someone else has it.  Wanting more money may be greed, but isn’t wanting someone else’s money without earning it an even greater greed?  The Occupiers want someone else’s money.  And they want it to they can buy the latest iPods and better cars.  If they really want to end greed they should get a job.

ADD CAIN TO THE LIST

The Democratic Party’s character assassins can cut another notch in their gun.  It looks like they have done it again, judges Pickering and Bork, candidates Palin and Cain all maliciously, viciously, personally and successfully attacked.  That’s not the full list, to be sure.

This time the Democrats may have shot themselves in the foot.  Cain would have vulnerabilities in the general election.  He is weak on foreign policy and has no experience in government.  Killing Cain cleared the way for Newt Gingrich to represent the conservative faction within the Republican Party.  It would do my heart good to see Cain win the nomination but Gingrich is the stronger candidate.

A note to Michelle:  I was always proud of my country until your husband became President. And I will be proud again when he’s not.

The HERMAN CAIN AFFAIR – SHADES of JUSTICE THOMAS, ANITA HILL REDUX ?

POLITICO reports:  Herman Cain accused by two women of inappropriate behavior

If you know the Democrats you knew this was coming.  The Party of Personal Destruction must spend half of their campaign finance money to find or make up dirt to sully their opponents or “enemies” as the current lot calls them.  It could backfire if it brings in some liberal votes from those who think it makes Cain look more Clintonesque.

Anonymous women make unspecified gestures and the target is immediately put on the defensive.  Call me biased or call me cynical, but I know the odds; and the odds are it’s Anita Hill Redux.  Odds are, I must admit, just a bet.  It’s a sad state when a reasonable man feels the odds are in favor of an American political party having degraded itself to this level rather than more traditionally plausible possibility that a man stepped over the line to cherchez la femme.

The unmitigated and totally invented filth thrown on Sarah Palin and her daughter is support enough to view the allegations against Cain with suspicion.  The attempt by certain members of the Black caucus to charge Tea Party demonstrators protesting Obamacare with spits and slurs is another.  Even a lowly honest plumber named Joe isn’t immune to these character assassins.