OBAMA RELEASES STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVES

U.S. national security has been forfeited to political expediency.  The Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are maintained in order to be available in the event of a national emergency.  Before this release the reserves were sufficient to protect us for just 59 days in the event of total disruption of imports.  That hardly seems adequate for calmer times let alone the period of .of geo-instability we are seeing right now.

The price of crude oil is down 19% from its recent high.  There is no upward price pressure.  There is no world shortage.  There is no interruption of supply.  Expectations are for weakening demand, not an increase; the markets are telling us that.  But now, when prices at the pump continue the decline that was already underway, the President will be in position to claim credit for lowering the price of gasoline and few people will be the wiser.

In reality, the impact will be minimal no matter what quantity he ultimately orders sold from the government supply into the market.  Furthermore, it will have only a one shot effect.  About 50% of U.S. oil consumption is imported.  If perchance, 10% of the SPR is released it would be a one time injection of 3 days consumption or less than 1% of a year’s consumption.

It’s dumb acts like this that cause some to wonder if Obama does not have the weakening of America as one of his objectives.  Sometimes it is not easy to decide whether he is incredibly dumb when it comes to economics or intentionally destructive.

OBAMA 23 – ANYONE ELSE 37

In a poll released today, by Bloomberg, 30% of all those polled said they definitely will vote for Obama in 2012.  36% said they definitely will not.  Among likely voters the numbers are even more striking.  Only 23% said they definitely will vote for Obama while 37% said they definitely will not.  The Republican Party doesn’t need to win; they only need not to lose.

Tennis is said to be a Loser’s Game.  By that it’s meant that it’s the loser, not the winner, who determines the outcome.  The loser blows it and gives the game away.  The moral is, if you want to win just return the ball, don’t try to blow your opponents socks off.  In that case the coach should say, Mrs. Palin, Mr. Paul you’re out.  Look for Democrats to vote to nominate Palin in those states that allow cross voting for party nominations.  It could be their only hope.

Of course all this is predicated on an unstable foundation; which is that the economy doesn’t show much improvement in the next sixteen months.  A week is an eternity in politics.  But right now an election would be a landslide.

WHAT A WACKEY WORLD

It’s amazing what you can learn from reading the links on Drudge.

Insect spies
In the military world we learn that the Pentagon is developing spy drones no bigger than an insect.  According to this New York Times report, the research is being conducted next to a cow pasture in North Carolina.  Finally we see some government efficiency.  If you are going to develop bug bombs it’s smart to do it where there is a good supply of bugs.

Trouble with Presidents
We always knew people died because Bush lied; now we find out President Obama is a murderer.  We have that from no less authority than the leader of the Nation of Islam, The Reverend Louis Farrakhan.  It must be true.  Certainly a Reverend wouldn’t lie.

Wrong urinal
We learn that one man peed away 8 million gallons of water in Portland, Oregon.  A surveillance camera recorded him in the act of finding bladder comfort on the shore of the town reservoir so the authorities drained it, all 8 million gallons.  Nothing was said of the small critters that roam its banks or the thoughtlessness of some of the birds that fly over the water.

Disqualified
Don’t fall into the same trap I did.  I paid my taxes and made my mortgage payments.  As a consequence, I don’t qualify for entry in a lottery to receive a grant from the latest billion dollar government fund for deadbeats.  Perhaps I’m being too harsh.  True misfortune has struck many a homeowner; but I suspect that true misfortune is not a requirement for application.

LIBYA – OBAMA’S WAR

The New York Times had the following to say regarding the Commander in Chief’s ordering of U.S. participation in the Libyan hostilities.

President Obama rejected the views of top lawyers at the Pentagon and the Justice Department when he [Obama] decided that he had the legal authority to continue American military participation in the air war in Libya without Congressional authorization.

Jeh C. Johnson, the Pentagon general counsel, and Caroline D. Krass, the acting head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, had told the White House that they believed that the United States military’s activities in the NATO-led air war amounted to “hostilities.” [that] required Mr. Obama to terminate or scale back the mission after May 20.

Presidents have the legal authority to override the legal conclusions of the Office of Legal Counsel and to act in a manner that is contrary to its advice, but it is extraordinarily rare for that to happen. Under normal circumstances, the office’s interpretation of the law is legally binding on the executive branch.

It was strictly a matter of copy and paste from NY Times to the RandomThots post other than minor editing, within the brackets, for clarity.  You can read the original article by clicking here.

My question is – what would you have written for a headline?  Perhaps “President Defies Legal Opinion of Government Counsel’? Or how about ”Obama Acts Contrary to Law According to Department of Justice and Pentagon Attorney”.  As a former headline copy writer, I can see that’s too long.  Here’s my choice, “Obama Decline to Obey the Law”.

The Times headline — “2 Top Lawyers Lost to Obama in Libya War Policy Debate”.

AUDACITY of HOPE, or a POLITICIANS RIGHT TO RAPE

DSK, aka Dominique Straus-Kahn the aspiring president of France, told the New York police that they could not arrest or hold him because he had diplomatic immunity.  In effect, was he not saying ‘I have a right to abuse women sexually because I am a politician’?

He was, of course, hoping to be free to return to his home in France.  Certainly, by making such a claim of immunity, he exhibited a massive audacity of hope.

Andrew Weiner (D-NY) said repeatedly and repeatedly, over and over again, (often) “I take full responsibility for my actions” but he refused to resign.  Full responsibility in Weiner’s mind, was limited to an admission of guilt.  In hoping a mere confession would enable him to remain in office, Weiner exhibited a massive audacity of hope.

Barack Obama (D-US) is following an agenda that is destructive to our nation.  More and more voters are coming to realize just what it was that Obama meant with his promise of Change.  He and his minions will be resoudedly thrown out of office on their kiesters in 2012.  That, my friends, is my audacity of hope.

Bob B.

VIDEOS FROM THE LIGHTER SIDE

Hat tip to reader Ron

JUSTAPHOTO

SOMETIMES A FELLA JUST NEEDS A LITTLE QUIET

WHAT IS IT THAT COMPELS AMERICAN COMPANIES TO GO OVERSEAS ?

The reason manufacturing and jobs are going overseas is as plain as the chart in front of your face.  As you can see from the chart, corporate tax rates have been trending down in OECD countries while U.S. corporate tax rates have remained among the highest in the developed world.

A business can absorb the cost of a little higher tax than its rivals and still remain competitive – – up to a point.  But when the difference is as much as 50%, it starts to become a matter of survival, not just the ability to compete.  At 39% the U.S. rate is exactly 50% higher than the average rate in the OECD countries.

The OECD is the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.  It is a group of 34 nations, mostly but not all, located in Europe.  These are not third world countries.  Typical members and their current corporate income tax rates include Germany (15%), Switzerland (8%), and the United Kingdom (26%).  Our rate (39%) is the absolute highest on the entire list of OECD countries.  The only other nations that exceed the 30% level are Belgium and France.

It is no secret which political party is acting to keep it that way.  It is the same party whose constituents complain the loudest about U.S. corporations sending jobs overseas.  It is the same party whose shibboleth is tax the rich.  It’s the party that penalizes achievement and supports indolence.  It is the party with the least understanding of how wealth is created and the best skills for appropriating it to spend in the furtherance of central planning agendas.  It is the Democratic Party.

Onerous domestic taxation is not the only reason companies choose to go overseas.  Laws and regulations are another.  It is not that regulations are more liberal in foreign lands, although that is often the case for certain industries.  The relative attraction is that you can plan and deal with the devil you know better than you can with one you don’t.  If there is one word that describes the business policies coming from the Obama administration, that word would be uncertainty.  Given the President’s position on Card Check, health insurance price controls, drilling moratorium, corporate executive salary controls and eagerness to partially nationalize companies in the name of bailouts it would be foolish to assume the uncertainty would unfold to the favorable side.

While the ever socialistic Europe is moving slightly to the right, the bastion of free market society that is America, is rushing hell-bent for leather to the left.  Eastern Europeans know where we are going.  They have been there and it wasn’t good.  We need to change course before we find out what they already know.  If we continue on the present course, believe me; it won’t be good.

SAVE YOUR MONEY. YOU WILL NEED IT TO BUY ELECTRICITY.

Electricity costs are projected to rise between 11 and 24 percent over the next 2 ½ years.  The rate of increase will vary according to where you live.  American Electric Power is one of the largest generators of electric power in the United States.  Taking AEP as an example we find that five of their coal fired generating plants will be unable to meet new EPA standards and will need to be shut down.  Six more generating plants are in jeopardy of the same fate, but might be saved with expenditures of 6 to 8 billion dollars.  In some regions the cost of production will rise by 35% by the end of 2014, according to a statement by AEP.

What the present administration cannot accomplish by legislation it does through regulation.  In 2008 Obama pledged to bankrupt the coal industry with Cap and Trade legislation but was not able to get Cap and Trade through Congress.  That left the job to the Environmental Protection Agency, hence these new proposals.

Here is what the National Economic Research Associates had to say about the new regs.

Using government data for its assumptions, NERA found the rules would increase costs for the electricity sector by more than $184 billion total or about $17.8 billion per year. Average electricity prices would increase by 11.5% and in some areas of the country, the increase could be as high as 23% in states such as Tennessee and Kentucky, according to the study.

The rules would also impact employment, with an estimated loss of 1.4 million job-years by 2020. A job-year is one job for one year, according to [the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity].

“The analysis by NERA shows that these would be some of the most expensive EPA rules ever imposed on coal-fueled power plants – costing more than $180 billion, causing double-digit rate electricity rate increases in many states, and leading to substantial job losses nationwide,” ACCCE President and CEO Steve Miller said in a statement Wednesday.

Details about the NERA study are available here.

And that’s not all.  Home heating costs would rise for those who use natural gas to heat their homes.  The NERA estimates the necessary conversion of some generating plants from coal to gas would increase the demand for gas by 26% causing natural gas prices to rise about 17% by the year 2016.

That’s the bad news.  The good news is that the bad news is a proposal.  Proposals are not inevitable.  Congress does have the power to intervene but has shown little inclination to do so.  This is an important issue that needs more attention.

ATHIESTS DONT HAVE NO SONGS

It’s Steve Martin with his latest parody. It’s exquisitely amusing. I like the laid back style of the performance. It gives the impression they put this together on a lark just a few minutes ago.
Who knows, maybe it was.